0
The strcpy function is declared in the <string.h> header of the C standard library. The function is used to copy a null-terminated string (a null-terminated array of type char). The function accepts two arguments: a pointer to the memory allocation where the copy will be placed; and a pointer to the first character of the null-terminated string to be copied. The memory allocation where the copy will be made must be large enough to accommodate the string, including the null-terminator.
Example usage:
void f (char* s) {
int len;
char* c;
len = strlen (s) + 1; /* determine length of string (including null-terminator) */
c = malloc (len); /* allocate memory for copy */
strcpy (c, s);
/* ... */
free (c); /* release allocation */
}
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Pointer version of string function strcpy?
char* strcpy(const char* src, char* dst) { char* tmp = dst; while ((*dst++ = *src++) != '\0'); return tmp; }
What is better strcpy or memcpy?
They do different things, so they are uncomparable.PS: strcpy can be implemented with strlen+memcpy:char *strcpy (char *dest, const char *src){size_t len;len= strlen (src);memcpy (dest, src, len);return dest;}
Why you are using strcpy in c plus plus?
In short, you don't. strncpy is deemed unsafe as it has potential to cause buffer overruns. To copy strings safely in C++, use std::string instead. For examples and syntax, see related links, below.
How do you write a user define function of strcpy?
char* u_strcpy (char* dest, const char* src) { char* temp = dest; while ((*dest++ = *src++) != '\0'); return temp; }
Write a function for concatnating the string s1 s2 and storing the result in string s3?
char *strmerge (char *s3, const char *s1, const char *s2) { strcpy (s3, s1); strcat (s3, s2); return s3; }
Pointer version of string function strcpy?
char* strcpy(const char* src, char* dst) { char* tmp = dst; while ((*dst++ = *src++) != '\0'); return tmp; }
To copy two strings using strcpy?
Using strcpy and strcat. Or sprintf. Or strlen+memcpy. There are more than solutions.
What is better strcpy or memcpy?
They do different things, so they are uncomparable.PS: strcpy can be implemented with strlen+memcpy:char *strcpy (char *dest, const char *src){size_t len;len= strlen (src);memcpy (dest, src, len);return dest;}
Why you are using strcpy in c plus plus?
In short, you don't. strncpy is deemed unsafe as it has potential to cause buffer overruns. To copy strings safely in C++, use std::string instead. For examples and syntax, see related links, below.
How do you write a user define function of strcpy?
char* u_strcpy (char* dest, const char* src) { char* temp = dest; while ((*dest++ = *src++) != '\0'); return temp; }
C program plus copy of string to another?
strcpy
What are the differences between memcpy vs strcpy?
memcpy is general purpose copy. and strcpy is specific for string copying. strcpy will copy the source string to destination string and terminate it with '\0' character but memcpy takes extra argument which specifies the number of bytes to copy.memcpy will not handle copying of overlapping memory. use memove instead.
Write a function for concatnating the string s1 s2 and storing the result in string s3?
char *strmerge (char *s3, const char *s1, const char *s2) { strcpy (s3, s1); strcat (s3, s2); return s3; }
C programming copying of two strings?
/* this is the same functionality as strcpy() */ /* note that this, like strcpy, is not buffer overrun safe */ char *StringCopy (char *destination, const char *source) { const char *temp = destination; while ((*destination++ = *source++) != '\0'); return temp; }
What is the difference between strcpy and strncpy in c language?
strcpy is meant to copy only null-terminated strings. It is probably implemented to copy every byte until it encounters a #0. strncpy() copies n bytes and it adds null termination at the end of the target string.
How do you call string function using pointers in main program?
An array name is a pointer, so using arrays as pointers in function calls is implicit. An example is...char a[] = "This is the source";char b[sizeof(a)];strcpy (b, a);This is exactly the same1 as saying...char a[] = "This is the source";char b[sizeof(a)];strcpy (&b[0], &a[0]);... or ...char* ap = "This is the source";char* bp = malloc(strlen (ap)+1);if (bp == NULL) { ... handle memory exception ... }strcpy (bp, ap);---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1However, while a and ap have the same value in these examples, they are not really the same. You can assign a new value to ap, but not to a, because a is an r-value that is not allocated a place in memory, as opposed to ap, which is a l-value. To reinforce this, both *ap and a[0] are l-values, meaning the same thing, but not quite so for ap and a. Be careful - they both have the same value, but ap is an assignable l-value, while a is a un-assignable r-value.
Write a program in 'c' language that accepts 10 strings as input and prints them in lexicographic order?
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> void main() { char a[4][25],temp[25]; int i,j; clrscr(); printf("Enter the names\n"); for (i=0;i<4;i++) gets(a[i]); for (i=0;i<3;i++) for (j=i+1;j<4;j++) { if (strcmp(a[i],a[j])>0) { strcpy(temp,a[i]); strcpy(a[i],a[j]); strcpy(a[j],temp); } } printf("Sorted strings are \n"); for (i=0;i<4;i++) puts (a[i]); getch(); }
