The original theory according to the Sumerians, Mayans, and the Egyptians is that planet X was around when they were around and they had basically made humankind what it is today and the theory is that on December 21st 2012 when the planets are supposed to align with the entire galaxy(Galactic alignment only happens every 26,000 years)...and Nibiru-(Planet X's real name) is an entire solar system of its own with a red dwarf star in the center with about 6 or 7 planets orbiting it and Nibiru is supposed to be the farthest one from its parent star..apparently the solar system itself is supposed to have its own orbital path, its supposed to be headed our way and if what iv'e seen on YouTube is correct. it supposed to fly past earth flipping the poles and sending a magnetic shockwave that will ravage the entire world and also it has a tail of meteorites and asteroids that will rain upon the world..this is all from what i researched
Centralization:decentralization::theory X:Theory Not-X
example of theory X is the toyota company example of theory Y is Google company Ashraf
The assumptions of a Theory X worker is that they are;lazydislike responsibilityresistant to changelack ambition
Theory X and Theory Y are two contrasting management theories proposed by Douglas McGregor in the 1960s. Theory X assumes that employees are inherently lazy and need to be closely controlled and directed. Theory Y, on the other hand, assumes that employees are self-motivated and can be trusted to take initiative and responsibility in their work.
Theory X is a group of ideas created by Douglas McGreggor in the 1960's. It deals with human motivations. He also discussed theory
One criticism of McGregor's Theory X is that it creates diseconomies of scale in large applications. One criticism of McGregor's Theory Y is that it may not be possible for the superior-subordinate relationship to flower organically.
McGregor's Theory X suggests that employees are lazy, need to be micromanaged, and prefer to be directed rather than take initiative. In contrast, Theory Y posits that employees are inherently motivated, responsible, and seek out challenges in their work. Theory Y aligns more with a participative management style, while Theory X is more authoritarian.
x assumes employees are unmotivated etc and have to be handled with severity like prison inmates Y assumes employees want to be productive, helpful and creative and can be managed to maximize these efforts. A theory X manager will soon beat the motivation out of a theory Y worker, thus proving to himself that X was right all along. A theory Y manager will eventually figure out that a theory X worker believes people are unmotivated because the worker himself is unmotivated. Thus, it is better for work teams to be all X or all Y. Given that, the Y teams will out produce the X teams.
enstiens einstein's theory of relativity e=mc squared
x= people are lazy and must be motivated and closely supervised Y= people want to do a good job, try to avoid doing things thad kill that motivation. A theory X manager with theory Y subordinates will soon beat the motivation out of them, thus proving to himself that he was right all along. A theory Y manager will eventually figure out that a theory X subordinate thinks all people are lazy because that subordinate is lazy himself. Thus, teams are best structured with all X of all Y types. The Y teams will consistently outperform the X teams.
There is no such thing as x bare theory.X-bar theory though is a linguistic grammar theory for which there already exists an answer on WikiAnswers.Bare phrase structure, on the other hand, is a principle of the the later Minimalist Program, sometimes referred to simply as Bare Theory.
The McGregor's theory x implies that workers need close supervision because they are not self motivated by nature. The theory y implies that there is no need for close supervision because employees can generally motivate themselves to meet targets.