Many people take the winner takes all approach to voting. This means that instead of choosing individual people for each seat, a person can just vote a straight ballot of candidates from their party, should they choose to do so.
All the Democrats are voting for Obama and all the Republicans are voting for Romney. If some Democrats are not voting for Obama it is probably because he did not choose a single payer plan to deal with health care and went with the more conservative insurance approach.
Ida tarbell's approck to sicial reform is she did not like woman voting
Voting for no other candidates but those on the Prohibition Party ticket or only for those who supported prohibition. The Prohibition Party called for the first approach whereas the Anti-Saloon League called for the latter approach.
no
Voting entrenched
only for NOT voting
No, voting is absolutely free.
fear of voting
Citizens voting directly on a proposed law
"The study was criticized for its unscientific approach in obtaining its data." "Medical doctors often consider the word 'miracle' to be unscientific and vague." "Voting for a candidate based on his charisma is a common but unscientific method."
Ignore it until you are in a position to have power to do something. Even voting is a step.
The member considers all views before voting on the bill ~Novanet