The word, for a proposed scientific explanation, for a set of observations, is a "Hypothesis".
The word is conclusion, as it shows the chemical or physical or any other changes occured during the practical duration.
Scientific Theory! ------- Induction.. also it is made up of a... claim ,data ,and science knowledge
An organized process for gathering observations is the scientific method. The scientific method consists of steps that help researchers get accurate information about research.
why would they tell me to answer it when i was the one typing the question? i am so very confused ! will someone answer my question plz! A Hypothesis ..... By - Kyo :D
The facts and the evidence. Debates are won by good debaters. Scientific discoveries are won by hard work, attention to methodological detail, hypothesis testing and repeating experiments and validating repeated observations. The scientific method is intellectually honest. Debates can be pure sophistry.Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact and not debatable any longer. The theory of evolution by natural selection is the best explanation we have of the fact of evolution. This is up for discovery, not debate in the usual sense. Bring your evidence, or keep silent. Good advice for all creationists.Plenty of material on evidences here.talkorigins.orgthepandasthumb.orgLinks here also.
An astronomer might formulate a hypothesis to explain a phenomenon or make predictions about celestial objects. For example, they could hypothesize about the composition of a distant star, the origin of a certain cosmic event, or the behavior of a particular celestial body. Hypotheses in astronomy are often based on observations, existing theories, and scientific principles, and they are typically tested through further observations, experiments, or data analysis.
that would be either a hypothesis or theory
Scientific Theory! ------- Induction.. also it is made up of a... claim ,data ,and science knowledge
That would depend on your observations and your explanation.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
If I had to say something it would be anything that cannot be tested. Existence of god, ghosts, etc. as the basis of the scientific method is to prove a hypothesis through tests and observations. Kinda butchered the explanation but you get what I mean. (I hope.)
One possible explanation for a wide variety of observations and experimental results could be the presence of a previously unidentified fundamental force or interaction. This new force could operate at scales not previously explored or could manifest in unique ways that challenge existing theories. Further research and experimentation would be needed to validate this hypothesis.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
i would assume it is known as a solution
i would assume you would just cross seedless oranges but is there a more scientific explanation? i would assume you would just cross seedless oranges but is there a more scientific explanation?
You would obviously record your observations in the first part of the scientific method i.e titled commonly as "Observation". Because only after recording your observation you can move onto the second part of scientific method i.e "Questioning".