Ralph Beebe Blackman has written: 'Linear data-smoothing and prediction in theory and practice' -- subject(s): Digital filters (Mathematics), Errors, Theory of, Random noise theory, Theory of Errors
There are far more than five scientific errors. The Geocentric theory for instance
Scientific Theory is tested by observations and experiments predicted by the theory. If the observations confirm the theory the theory is validated if not the theory is not validated. Experiments themselves need validation, often there are errors in the experiments or observations, e.g Michaelson and Morley Aether experiment and red shift observations.
Henry Briggs has written: 'The effects of errors in surveying' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Triangulation, Theory of Errors
This is usually considered evidence against the theory or that the theory needs adjustments. However if similar experiments of similar quality confirm the theory, this experiment may have hidden errors.
Dalton's atomic theory or model was accepted despite errors. This is because his theory provided a logical explanation of concepts and led the way to new experimentations.
Bartlett's theory about schema-driven errors has been criticized for being too vague and lacking empirical evidence to support its claims. Critics argue that the theory oversimplifies complex cognitive processes and may not fully account for individual differences in memory and cognition. Additionally, some researchers suggest that the theory may not adequately explain how schemas are formed and how they influence memory retrieval.
Cheng Hsiao has written: 'Linear regression using both temporally aggregated and temporally disaggregated data' -- subject(s): Regression analysis, Time-series analysis 'Measurement error in a dynamic simultaneous equations model with stationary disturbances' -- subject(s): Equations, Simultaneous, Errors, Theory of, Simultaneous Equations, Theory of Errors
Robert H. Cousins has written: 'The Mechanical Errors In The Common Theory Of Flexures' -- subject(s): Flexure
This theory involves strict judicial restraint, to the degree where past 'errors' are corrected. In a sense, it is the reversal of decisions that are thought to too activist centered.
A hypothesis is just a (any) guess. To be considered "scientific" it must be testable (against reality). A theory is concept (it was a hypothesis) which HAS been tested and - so far - has not been found wanting (i.e. no errors [yet]).
causation is the theory that something happened due to a given cause. Cause and effect basically. It is known to be inherantly prone to false positive type errors in assumption.