Most people will avoid work because they do not like it and must be threatened or persuaded to put forth adequate effort. People have little ambition and do not want responsibility.
Centralization:decentralization::theory X:Theory Not-X
example of theory X is the toyota company example of theory Y is Google company Ashraf
The assumptions of a Theory X worker is that they are;lazydislike responsibilityresistant to changelack ambition
Theory X and Theory Y are two contrasting management theories proposed by Douglas McGregor in the 1960s. Theory X assumes that employees are inherently lazy and need to be closely controlled and directed. Theory Y, on the other hand, assumes that employees are self-motivated and can be trusted to take initiative and responsibility in their work.
Theory X is a group of ideas created by Douglas McGreggor in the 1960's. It deals with human motivations. He also discussed theory
One criticism of McGregor's Theory X is that it creates diseconomies of scale in large applications. One criticism of McGregor's Theory Y is that it may not be possible for the superior-subordinate relationship to flower organically.
McGregor's Theory X suggests that employees are lazy, need to be micromanaged, and prefer to be directed rather than take initiative. In contrast, Theory Y posits that employees are inherently motivated, responsible, and seek out challenges in their work. Theory Y aligns more with a participative management style, while Theory X is more authoritarian.
x assumes employees are unmotivated etc and have to be handled with severity like prison inmates Y assumes employees want to be productive, helpful and creative and can be managed to maximize these efforts. A theory X manager will soon beat the motivation out of a theory Y worker, thus proving to himself that X was right all along. A theory Y manager will eventually figure out that a theory X worker believes people are unmotivated because the worker himself is unmotivated. Thus, it is better for work teams to be all X or all Y. Given that, the Y teams will out produce the X teams.
McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y present contrasting views of employee motivation. Theory X assumes that employees are inherently lazy, require supervision, and are motivated by extrinsic rewards, leading to a more authoritarian management style. For example, a factory manager who closely monitors workers and enforces strict rules embodies Theory X. In contrast, Theory Y posits that employees are self-motivated, seek responsibility, and thrive in a collaborative environment, exemplified by a manager who encourages autonomy and supports professional development.
enstiens einstein's theory of relativity e=mc squared
x= people are lazy and must be motivated and closely supervised Y= people want to do a good job, try to avoid doing things thad kill that motivation. A theory X manager with theory Y subordinates will soon beat the motivation out of them, thus proving to himself that he was right all along. A theory Y manager will eventually figure out that a theory X subordinate thinks all people are lazy because that subordinate is lazy himself. Thus, teams are best structured with all X of all Y types. The Y teams will consistently outperform the X teams.
There is no such thing as x bare theory.X-bar theory though is a linguistic grammar theory for which there already exists an answer on WikiAnswers.Bare phrase structure, on the other hand, is a principle of the the later Minimalist Program, sometimes referred to simply as Bare Theory.