It does not make a difference if the pasta is cooked or not, as water will add no calories to it.
It's a kind of fresh pasta made with eggs, flour and boiled herbs (usually nettle's leafs).
durum flour is what i know is used in pasta.
No, pasta is basically flour .No, pasta is basically flour .
Yes. But it is not like the kind of pasta we currently have in America.
I had a similar question asked to me by someone counting their calories. The problem was this: They had a 250g bag of pasta. The nutrition label gave 100grams of uncooked pasta (therefore, half a pack was 125grams). The label also gave the value for half a pack of cooked pasta which was 190 grams. The calories in 100gram uncooked was 172kcal, while half a pack of cooked jumped massively to 326kcal. Why? A quick mathematical look at this clearly showed that half a pack of uncooked pasta did not have the same amount of calories as the cooked pasta. So why is cooking pasta increasing calories, does water magically add water? A couple of weeks later, and luckily, we were eventually given information (that was at least believable) from a trainee medical student... They said that if you eat raw uncooked pasta, there is a lot of calories and nutrition that are not digestible by the human body. In other words, they go straight through your body. When you cook pasta and other carb-dense foods like rice and couscous, it alters the chemical makeup of the food (it kind of unlocks the remaining 'invisible' nutrition) and makes the previously undigestible nutrition available for the body to absorb. 'Hope that helps :)
Calcium Potassium Wheat protein if its wheat pasta
Pasta can be analogous to a kind of "knot theory."
lazana
carbohydrate
A few examples: Chilli and rice, omlettes, all sorts of pasta, jambalaya, any kind of stew, spaghetti bolognese, stir fry dishes, boiled fish, fried foods, soups.
Pasta
The modern and classical physics is found in nutrition.