because they had no right in government what so ever. Only the British could choose laws, pass them, and only British people were aloud to become Representatives after the Boston tea party.
To be fair most British people weren't represented in parliament either. Parliament was restricted to the upperclasses, even the so called Great Reform Act of 1832 only gave very limited voting rights to the British people. Taxation without representation was as much a complaint within Britain as it was in British colonies. Look up things like Peterloo.
"NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION". The colonists didn't want to pay taxes because of this simple phrase. I think you can get the meaning from that. Parliament didn't have any consent from delegates from the colonies on the taxing issue. They boycotted British goods, forcing Britain to repeal the taxes.
I think it was patriotism because they were standing up for themselves & their country, they had no representation, and they didn't' want to be controlled by parliament
Taxation without representation was a huge complaint by the colonists because they believed it violated their rights as English citizens. They argued that since they had no elected representatives in the British Parliament, they had no say in decisions regarding taxation. This lack of representation was seen as unfair and oppressive, leading to increasing tensions between the colonists and the British government.
AnswerIt affected people in all of the colonies.It was a tax placed on goods that increased the cost of many essentials that were not available from other sources The term "No taxation without representation" sprung from this law because the colonist felt that if they payed the tax that they should be represented by officials elected by them.
doodoo
Number one reason was lack of representation in Parliament, which created no home control over Colonial administration. Sheryl Graham-Shockley
representation
because colonist didn't had no representation in the parliment
The colonists did not want taxes imposed by the british parliament.
the colonists did not want to be taxed directly by parliament
"NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION". The colonists didn't want to pay taxes because of this simple phrase. I think you can get the meaning from that. Parliament didn't have any consent from delegates from the colonies on the taxing issue. They boycotted British goods, forcing Britain to repeal the taxes.
Jefferson and other revolutionaries had the battlecry "no taxation without representation". Really, they didn't want taxes. However, they felt that they needed to be directlyrepresented, which is how the United States is set up today. Parliament had indirect or virtual representation, that is, they represented the whole empire and did what they thought was good for the entire British Empire as opposed to the region they came from.
The British government wanted to raise taxes on the colonist after they funded the French and Indian War, and needed money. The colonist decided they did not want to be taxed without representation in the government. -"No Taxation Without Representation" was a slogan that was used to deflect the real desire to expand into the western land, to which England had made treaties with the indian nations not to expand into its territories, to end the French/Indian wars. So, began the American habit of repeatedly breaking treaties with the Indians.
If you refer to the US colonies, it was to do with taxation levied from London, but without any direct representation in the British Parliament.
the colonist were divided into two groups, patriots who wanted to be free and loyaltists you want the king two rule. The king began to tax the colonist really high costs on stuff that shouldn't be that much. Also they finally got there freedom and Britain was taxing them to pay for the French and Indian war WITHOUT REPRESENTATION
The fundamental argument against Parliament's taxation was that since the colonies did not receive representation in Parliament, they should not be taxed. The colonists had lobbied for representation for years, without success. As a result, the sudden levying of taxes by Parliament was totally unexpected, and angered the colonists. Although the taxes levied differed, this was the fundamental argument for all of them, including the Stamp Act.
The colonist wanted their independence because they wanted freedom.