0
Laws that effect "suspect classifications" or "fundamental rights" must be justified by a compelling governmental interest. Further, the law must be necessary to achieve the compelling interest.
If you have found this answer helpful please mark it as "helpful" so that future individuals searching for answers will find them easier and authors will receive credit.
Thank you,
Koberlein Law Offices, PLLC
Lake City, Columbia County, Florida
Live Oak, Suwannee County, Florida
What else can I help you with?
What best describes the most exacting level of judicial review regarding whether a law is narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling governmental interest?
The most exacting level of judicial review regarding whether a law is narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling governmental interest is called strict scrutiny. Under strict scrutiny, the government must demonstrate that the law serves a compelling interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest, with no less restrictive alternatives available. This level of review is typically applied in cases concerning fundamental rights or suspect classifications, such as race or religion.
According to the Supreme Court what standards must laws that discriminate between groups meet?
The strict scrutiny test; the state must be able to show that some "compelling governmental interest" justifies the distinctions it has drawn between classes of people.
What supreme court ruling said that affirmative action programs must show some compelling governmental issues?
Adarand Constructors v. Pena
How do you take away visitation rights?
Only by a court order. The court must be provided with compelling evidence the visits are not in the best interest of the child.
In governmental funds governments must accrue interest on general long-term liabilites or short-term debt of the fund?
short term debt
What are some tips in getting exclusive custody in California?
First, you must have a good reason and compelling evidence. Second, you should hire a good lawyer.First, you must have a good reason and compelling evidence. Second, you should hire a good lawyer.First, you must have a good reason and compelling evidence. Second, you should hire a good lawyer.First, you must have a good reason and compelling evidence. Second, you should hire a good lawyer.
Why you must use WikiAnswers?
Nobody is compelling you to use Wikianswers.
What is the law that banned discrimination?
Various laws have restricted certain kinds of discrimination in the United States. Like State Legislatures, the Congress of the United States has the power to pass statutes regulating a wide range of activity. The 1964 Civil Rights Act, for example, placed limits on discrimination (among other things) in the workplace and at businesses that are open to the public. The decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States are another source of law because Supreme Court decisions that interpret the Constitution become the supreme law of the land. Responding to various cases and controvercies that have come before it, the Court has repeatedly ruled that no government entity may discriminate on the basis of race without meeting what is called "strict scrutiny." For governmental discrimination on the basis of race to stand, the government must show both a "compelling interest" and show that no less restrictive means would meet that interest. The practical impact of this requirement is that virtually all governmental race discrimination is prohibited. (One important exception is affirmative action.) The Supreme Court has similarly ruled that no governmental entity may discriminate on the basis of gender without meeting what the Court calls "intermediate scrutiny." In contrast to strict scrutiny, which requires a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored means to that end, the intermediate scrutiny test is slightly easier to pass. To pass intermediate scrutiny and permissibly discriminate on the basis of gender, a governmental entitly must prove an important government interest and must prove the means used to reach that end are substantially related to that interest. While there has not yet been a law that bans all forms of discrimination in all contexts, stautes passed by Congress and rulings of the Supreme Court have worked together to combat many of discrimination's harmful effects.
How do you unseal a divorce decree?
If the court has sealed a divorce decree then you must petition the court to unseal it for you. You must provide the court with a compelling reason why you should be granted access to that file.If the court has sealed a divorce decree then you must petition the court to unseal it for you. You must provide the court with a compelling reason why you should be granted access to that file.If the court has sealed a divorce decree then you must petition the court to unseal it for you. You must provide the court with a compelling reason why you should be granted access to that file.If the court has sealed a divorce decree then you must petition the court to unseal it for you. You must provide the court with a compelling reason why you should be granted access to that file.
How many members must be in an interest group?
how many members must be in an interest group how many members must be in an interest group
When Justice Lewis Powell stated that racial and ethnic distinctions require the most exacting judicial examination he meant these qualities required?
Justice Lewis Powell's statement emphasized that racial and ethnic distinctions in legal contexts demand a high level of scrutiny to ensure fairness and equality. This means that laws or policies that differentiate based on race or ethnicity must be rigorously evaluated to prevent discrimination and protect civil rights. The intent is to safeguard against unjust treatment and ensure that any such distinctions serve a compelling governmental interest and are narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.
How did the superme court use the equal protection principle to address discrimination in the work place?
The Supreme Court used the equal protection principle to address discrimination in the workplace by ruling that classifications based on race or gender must meet a strict scrutiny standard to be constitutional. This meant that any discrimination based on these characteristics had to be justified by a compelling government interest to be valid. The Court's decisions established that equal protection of the laws applied to employment practices, helping to combat discrimination in the workplace.
