0
What limited powers of congress meant it could not deal effectively with?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
The limited powers of Congress meant it could not deal effectively with the country's economic problems and trade problems.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The Articles of Confederation limited the powers of what body?
The Articles of Confederation limited the powers of the central government, known as the Confederation Congress. This central government had limited authority and could not levy taxes or regulate trade, among other limitations.
What limits does article i place on the powers of congress?
Article 1 of the Constitution places several limits on the powers of Congress, including taxing exports from a state and granting titles of nobility. It also prevents Congress from suspending the passage of writs of habeas corpus.
What powers did the confederation congress have?
They had limited powers. They could make coins, borrow money, make treaties with other countries and the Indians, settle conflicts between the states, and they could ASK states for money and soldiers, but they could not force the states to give money or soldiers, even in an emergency.
Second continental congress and the Articles of Confederation?
National government with limited powers. Congress could settle conflicts among states, make coins, and borrow money. States had the power to refuse requests, and did not have a president or court system.
What powers did legislative assemblies have?
The Legislative Assembly could impose taxes, and propose bills, they had limited powers
What powers did Congress not have?
The congress had no power to tax unanimous decision for amendment, no separation of powers they could not get anything done.
What powers did the articles of confederation give to congress and what powers did they with hold?
denied-the right for a state to print it's own money
Jefferson and Hamilton differed on the question of whether or not Congress could do what?
They disagreed on practically everything but their esteem for George Washington. Specifically, however, their greatest and most significant difference on a power of Congress was whether Congress could establish a national bank (the "First Bank of the United States"). Hamilton argued that because Article I, section 9 of the Constitution did not specifically prohibit Congress from creating a national bank, then Congress was empowered to do so under Article I, section 8, clause 18 (the "implied powers clause," "necessary and proper clause," or "elastic clause"). Jefferson, who took a more limited view of Federal power, argued that because Article I, section 8 did not specify Congress could create a national bank, then it could not. Jefferson believed that only specified powers (such as power to tax, to maintain an army, to punish counterfeiters, etc.) could be exercised by Congress.
Why did the framers make the executive branch share some of its powers with congress?
They could see into the future.
What are some major specific prohibitions on States?
The states are prohibited from exercising any foreign affairs powers, unless specifically granted the right to do by Congress in limited circumstances. For example, a State could not declare war on another country.
What Constitutional principal would not exist if members of congress could serve in the presidents cabinet?
The separation of powers.
Why did the framers include the necessary and proper clause?
The framers could predict the laws that Congress may need to carry out their powers in the future. They created the 'necessary and proper clause' so that Congress could enact laws they need to effectuate their powers.
