Their fortress palaces are protected by walls of stone blocks, so large that only giants would seem capable of heaving them into place. This style of architecture has been appropriately named Cyclopean, after the Cyclopes (a race of one-eyed giants encountered by Odysseus in the Odyssey). The walls at Tiryns, said in Greek legend to have built by the Cyclopes for the legendary king Proteus, provide the most striking example.
Well,it is so obviase it is made of rubber that we use to rub out a spelling
"Internal" is not a C++ keyword, so it is meaningless in this context. "Protected" means that the class member is visible to (has scope from) only the class and classes derived from the class.
When you derive a class (the sub-class) from a base class using protected access, all public members of the base class become protected members of the derived class, while protected members of the base class will remain protected. Private members are never inherited so they remain private to the base class. By contrast, if you use public inheritance, the public members of the base class remain public to the derived class, while protected members of the base class remain protected in the derived class. If you use private inheritance, both the public and protected members of the base class become private to the derived class. Note that accessibility cannot be increased, only reduced or left the same. That is, a protected member of a base class cannot be inherited as a public member of a derived class -- it can only be declared private or remain protected. Note also that accessibility is viewed from outside of the derived class. That is, all members of a base class other than the private members are inherited by the derived class and are therefore fully accessible to the derived class. But from outside of the derived class, all base class accessibility is determined by the access specified by the type of inheritance.
The best design strategy would be to provide a protected accessor (getter) that returns the variable either by value or by constant reference. If the derived class needs to mutate the variable, then provide a protected mutator (setter). Only derived classes have protected access to their base classes. However, derivatives can also lower that access to private with respect to their own derivatives, if desired. Even if the variable does not represent a class invariant, it's still best to provide an interface rather than expose an implementation detail outside of the class, whether that exposure is public or protected. In this way the implementation detail may be changed at a future time without affecting any of the consumers of your class (including derivatives), since they will all be using the public or protected interface. So long as that interface remains unchanged, the scope of your internal changes is limited to the class itself, thus you won't break any code that uses your class. If your class already provides a public interface to the variable, then your derived class can obviously make use of that as well. You only need a protected interface when no public interface is provided.
The first tractor was made by John Froelich. It was made so farming can be much easier and not as threatning as the steam engine and it wont hurt the crops such as grain
its because of their government
So you are better protected
Well it protected people from bombs!
The tomb of Tutankhamen was well protected as it was built under the tomb of Ramses II, another Egyptian Pharaoh. It was also intact for this reason.
i dont no but i need this 4 social studies so somebody improve this
Runescape is one of the few games that is so well protected that there are no cheats, so stop looking
I don't think so because it is very well protected
for we Indians tiger is the national animal. I want them to be well protected so they can be find in good numbers.
what made Artemis the protector of wild game was that she was the goddess of hunt so she protected the wild game.
If you ever "hit your funny bone" you did, but nerves are well protected and so its easier to do it during surgery.
The embryo is very well protected in there so I doubt it.
No they are not protected, they in truth are not a species. They are a man made hybrid produced as a novelty for tourist attractions and the pet trade. They do not occur naturally in the wild so they do not require conservation.