The archaeologist may conclude that the society valued warfare and had skilled craftsmen who produced high-quality weapons. The well-made weapons suggest a certain level of sophistication and technology within the society, as well as a focus on military prowess and defense.
The archaeologist may conclude that the society valued military strength and warfare as they invested resources in creating high-quality weapons. Conversely, the poor quality of farm tools suggests a lack of investment in agriculture, indicating possible food scarcity or a focus on other areas of society. This disparity could indicate a hierarchical society prioritizing military over agriculture.
The type of evidence that an archaeologist would find most useful is artifacts, such as tools, pottery, and weapons. These objects provide direct insights into the daily lives and activities of past cultures.
An archaeologist would be more likely to explore the site of an ancient battle, as their expertise lies in studying material remains to understand past events. They would excavate the site to uncover artifacts, weapons, and other evidence that could provide insights into the battle. Historians, on the other hand, would primarily rely on documented accounts and texts to analyze the battle.
Artifacts studied by archaeologists can include tools, pottery, jewelry, weapons, and art. These items provide insights into past societies' technology, culture, social structures, and beliefs. By examining artifacts, archaeologists can reconstruct and understand aspects of ancient civilizations.
The Shang dynasty used bronze primarily for making weapons, tools, and ceremonial vessels. Bronze played a significant role in their society, symbolizing power, wealth, and elite status.
they can conclude that the society focused more on warfare than farming concluding that they probably fell because of bad leadership and hunger
they can conclude that the society focused more on warfare than farming concluding that they probably fell because of bad leadership and hunger
they can conclude that the society focused more on warfare than farming concluding that they probably fell because of bad leadership and hunger
The archaeologist may conclude that the society valued military strength and warfare as they invested resources in creating high-quality weapons. Conversely, the poor quality of farm tools suggests a lack of investment in agriculture, indicating possible food scarcity or a focus on other areas of society. This disparity could indicate a hierarchical society prioritizing military over agriculture.
A person who studies ancient weapons might be a military historian, or might be an archaeologist. There is more than one reason to study ancient weapons.
Lending/ trading or giving away accounts is not allowed in aqw. Even so, using that person's account to get weapons won't give you the weapons, it will still be on their account.
The type of evidence that an archaeologist would find most useful is artifacts, such as tools, pottery, and weapons. These objects provide direct insights into the daily lives and activities of past cultures.
no
Iron weapons
There are a number of different ways that Japanese Samurai weapons have influenced modern society. One of the main ways is in the teachings of martial arts.
weapons
The address of the Navy Nuclear Weapons Association is: 1087 Frank Kelly Rd, Society Hill, SC 29593-5079