The New Testament consists of books that purport to tell a history of early Christianity, such as some of the epistles, the gospels and Acts of the Apostles, and books that provide instruction and revelation, such as others of the epistles, Hebrews and Revelation. It is the first class of book that relies on memories of events that may have occurred.
With the possible exception of Hebrews, the epistles of Paul were based on his own experiences and understanding of Christianity, as well as instructions and negotiations with the churches he was associated with. He must have received some information from predecessors, in order to be able to state confidently that the risen Jesus was seen by Cephas, then the twelve, then by more than 500, most of whom were still alive, then by James and all the apostles. That this account is so much at variance with the gospel account suggests that he did not receive it from any eyewitnesses. Moreover, Paul implied that the appearances were all of the same nature, suggesting that all of the appearances to Cephas, the twelve, James and the apostles were no more real than the spiritual appearance he experienced. His source for this information appears to have been preaching a more spiritual Jesus.
It has been shown, and is accepted by most scholars, that the authors of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke relied on the Gospel of Mark for their knowledge of the life and mission of Jesus. They were not, themselves, actual eyewitnesses or associates of eyewitnesses, as was traditionally supposed. Bishop Spong (Born of a Woman: A bishop rethinks the birth of Jesus) argues convincingly that the two gospel stories of the birth of Jesus are not historical accounts. So we do not need to wonder what memories these were based on, or how the evangelists could have known of family events occurring around a hundred years earlier. Similarly, Father Raymond E Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says that the gospel genealogies of Jesus are unlikely to be literally true.
It has also been shown that John's Gospel was based on Luke's Gospel and, to a lesser extent, Mark's Gospel.
So all the gospel memories lead back to the Gospel According to St Mark. This has some parallels to Paul's epistles and it has been suggested that the author of Mark was able to take some key names and events from Paul's epistles and weave a story around them. The gospel memories may have begun with Paul.
The Old and New Testament of the Holy Bible does not come from memories. The books were written by men under the inspiration of Holy Spirit.
God
AnswerNo. Scholars have established that in almost every case, the books of the Bible were written long after the events they describe, sometimes centuries afterwards, by authors who were not eyewitnesses to the events they described.
It is the first book in the New Testament.
First that question is not properly written to give you the perfect answer. The "Christian testament"? The Bible is made out of the "Old Testament" and the "New Testament" which is the Bible. The Bible is broken up by different books that create the Old and the New. In the Old Testament, that is where Jesus has not yet come to earth and die for our sins. Therefore, in the Old Testament there was worse judgment on the world. Then, the New Testament is when Jesus finally came to earth to die for our sins so that we may have eternal life. Basically, the Bible is in two halves. The Old Testament starts with Genesis where God talks about how he created the world. Then the New Testament starts in the Book of Matthew then so on. If you are looking to study about Jesus Christ, start with the New Testament.
The Old and New Testament of the Holy Bible does not come from memories. The books were written by men under the inspiration of Holy Spirit.
The Old and New Testament of the Holy Bible does not come from memories. The books were written by men who were inspired by Holy Spirit.
After the prophets wrote it
God
AnswerNo. Scholars have established that in almost every case, the books of the Bible were written long after the events they describe, sometimes centuries afterwards, by authors who were not eyewitnesses to the events they described.
Judaism-believes the Old Testament and that the messiah which the Old Testament fortells has not come. Christianity- believes the Old Testament and the New Testament and that the Messiah which the Old Testament fortells has already come. John 3:16 (in New Testament) "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that who so ever believes in Him shall not parish but have everlasting life. " Jesus Christ is this Son/Messiah, according to the New Testament.
Before James in the New Testament is Hebrews and after James is 1 Peter.
Matthew 2:2 "...are come to worship him..."
Yes, the readings usually follow the plan: Old Testament, Psalm, New Testament (Epistle or other non-Gospel reading), Alleluia verse, Gospel in a Sunday Mass. The Second reading is omitted during the week, and the first reading may be from either the Old Testament or the New Testament.
New Testament
The Old Testament laid the foundation for the coming of Jesus Christ in the New Testament. The New Testament fulfills the prophecies and promises made in the Old Testament, showing how they are interconnected and part of the overarching narrative of God's plan for humanity. Jesus himself often referenced the Old Testament scriptures to demonstrate how they foretold his arrival and mission.
The New Testament books were all written after Christ's resurrection. It is a separate testament from the Old Testament. We can see looking back all the many hints given in the Old Testament of a new and better testament to come, but hind sight is 20 20, as it was in large part hidden from the people living in the time of the Old Testament. All of the books of the Old Testament were written 400 years before Christ and earlier. The New Testament, as the Old Testament are both completely inspired by God.