0
It depends entirely on the philosopher.
Hobbes and Locke both held that the state of nature was a violent and terrible place in which to live. People regularly killed and maimed each other for temporary benefits.
Aristotle and other classical philosophers found the question meaningless, holding that man would naturally form cities and societies since people are inherently political. The same way that oil will always separate from water, people will always evade the state of nature.
Rousseau held that the state of nature was relatively peaceable, but still much less desirable than a society held together by a social contract. As a result, people will tend to create social contracts to improve their lot, but the state of nature is not a horrible place.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What might life be like for people living in a state of natural?
To live in a state of nature would be absolute chaos and hell. There are no rules, no laws, no government. Although it could be beneficial to have no corrupt government or dictators, one will eventually form.
The court may not take a man's life without what?
Depending on the nature of their court, they might just kill him if they don't like him.
The Courts may not take a man's life without?
Depending on the nature of their court, they might just kill him if they don't like him.
Is social contract theory and state of nature the same thing?
No, social contract theory and state of nature are not the same thing. State of nature refers to a theoretical condition describing human existence without government, while social contract theory proposes that individuals consent to give up certain freedoms in exchange for the protection and benefits of a governing authority. The state of nature sets the foundation for social contract theory by illustrating the need for a system of governance.
What might life be like in state of nature?
It depends entirely on the philosopher. Hobbes and Locke both held that the state of nature was a violent and terrible place in which to live. People regularly killed and maimed each other for temporary benefits. Aristotle and other classical philosophers found the question meaningless, holding that man would naturally form cities and societies since people are inherently political. The same way that oil will always separate from water, people will always evade the state of nature. Rousseau held that the state of nature was relatively peaceable, but still much less desirable than a society held together by a social contract. As a result, people will tend to create social contracts to improve their lot, but the state of nature is not a horrible place.
Which of he following statements is about thomas hobbes and john Locke is not correct?
One statement that is true about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes is that both imagined what life was like in a state of nature.
Why are mexcian guys such big flirts?
It might be in their nature. They might be open to boys. They like boys obviously that is why they flirt.
Is Kansas red state or blue state?
Kansas is a red state, typically, but this election it seems like it might go blue.
What does iodine look like in nature?
Bluish-Black Solid, and Purple in Gaseous state
What does Carl Linnaeus' quote Nature does not proceed by leaps and bounds mean?
he trying to say nature dosent move around like we do we have diffrent life styls fos example wide life
What was life like in stalins totalitarian state?
i have no clue
What might the system of nature means?
It means like all about trees, plants, birds, and other things!
