Want this question answered?
Doppler-shifted stellar spectrum and physics calculations that indicate a low-mass object
Some information that would help: unambiguous evidence that there are systematic, independently verifiable differences in personality based on date and time of birth, and systematic, independently verifiable evidence that unambiguous and non-frivolous predictions made from astrological readings have later come true.
Mars because the Mars Rovers discovered evidence that there was once flowing water.
There is no proof of that, however statistics suggest that it is almost entirely certain that it exists- the possibility of a planet to house life is very small, however there are many planets (pentillions of them) in our universe, and that small chance multiplied by that number gives us good chances of life elsewhere.
There might be, but wee have no way to find out. If we get even remotly clos to the sun, we will burn away.
helium capture
"Might suggest Athens was the leader of all the Greeks" (source: Gardener's art through the ages textbook)
free radicals? im not sure we have the technology to do true fusion. you might be confused with fission.
The evidence might be unreliable because technology and other knowledge has advanced since that time, and their evidence might have been biased.
Some might, not all though. It would depend on design (e.g. a "clean" fusion bomb might use a lead tamper on the fusion stage instead of uranium-238, but it might just as likely use iron or tungsten).
You might want to check but you should be able to fusion is compatible with most autodesk products
Direct evidence are visible noticable changes. Indirect evidence is when you might not see the action happen but you do notice the results
This depends on the evidence you are seeking. If you are looking for a stolen car then you search differently than if you are looking for stolen coins. Generally you search in any area where your target items may be located. A rifle would not be inside a cigar box, a handgun might.
Artificial fusion has been achieved already. In fact it has been done in different ways. The problems with fusion include how to achieve it without consuming more power than is produced, and how to keep such a reaction going. The Farnsworth-Hirsch fusor is a fusion reactor a student might build as a project, but it sufferes these problems. Another problem with fusion is that many of the methods tried are expensive to test. The polywell is a reactor with such a problem. It is the result of many years of experimentation by Robert Bussard. According to Dr. Bussard, the polywell worked briefly before the apparatus burned out. Unfortunately he lost funding, and then died, and the effort is slowed as a result, so we do not actually know he was right. So the answer might be that we already have achieved practical fusion. We just have to determine that it is true. Or the answer might be that we have not achieved practical fusion, and if that is the case, it might be years or decades away.
Correct me if I am wrong but I think it might be destruction blast
What evidence is there?
They might eat chicken