0
What new precedent did they established for the Nuremberg trial?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
One new precedent established at the Nuremberg Trials was the concept of holding individuals accountable for committing acts deemed as crimes against humanity, even if they were following orders from a superior. This helped set the foundation for the principles of international law that hold individuals responsible for their actions during wartime.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How can you use zenger trial in a sentence?
The Zenger Trial in 1735 set a precedent for freedom of the press in colonial America when John Peter Zenger, a printer, was acquitted of seditious libel charges after publishing critical articles about the colonial governor of New York.
Was there controversy in the Nuremberg Trials?
Yes, there was controversy surrounding the Nuremberg Trials, particularly regarding the legality of retroactively applying new laws to prosecute war crimes, the fairness of the trials, and the scope of punishment. Some critics argued that the trials were victor's justice and undermined the defendants' right to a fair trial.
How are a mistrial and a new trial alike?
Both involve a legal proceeding being stopped and restarted. A mistrial occurs when the original trial is terminated due to a serious error or issue, while a new trial is scheduled to start fresh after the first trial's outcome is overturned. In both cases, the aim is to ensure a fair legal process and outcome for all parties involved.
What describes using prior cases as a guide for deciding similar new cases?
Using prior cases as a guide for deciding similar new cases is known as precedent. This concept is fundamental in common law legal systems where past decisions by higher courts serve as authoritative guidance for current and future cases. Precedent helps ensure consistency, predictability, and fairness in the legal system.
Is trial a proper noun?
No, the noun 'trial' is a common noun, a general word for a type of procedure or situation.A proper noun is the name of a specific person, place, or thing; for example, the New York State Trial Lawyers Association in New York City or Trial Place in Newton, NC.
What case established the precedent that true statements about public officials could not be prosecuted as libel?
The Crown v. Peter Zenger, New York, November 2, 1734
Do the facts in the new case have to be the same as those which the precedent was established when applying case law?
No.
The northwest ordinance of 1787 established what precedent for new territories?
The precedent established by the Northwest Ordinance was the equality of new states with old states. The act was passed on July 13, 1787.
Can you give me a sentence using the word precedent?
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines "precedent" as "prior in time, order, arrangement, or significance." Example sentences include:George Washington established a precedent for future presidents to followJim set a new precedent by being the first person to lick his own elbow
What are some reasons for a losing party to motion for a new trial?
A losing party can file for a new trial if the jury was prejudiced against them. For example, if BP were to be put on trial for their oil spill in Louisiana, many of the potential jurors would be very angry at BP for what they did. This would make them rule against BP even if they didn't break the law. So, a new trial would need to be held elsewhere. Or, we could pretend that a man named Alan killed a man named Bob. If 8 of Bob's relatives were on the 12 person jury, then Alan could move for a new trial after he lost, because he could say that the jury was prejudiced against him. A losing party can also file for a new trial if he or she thinks that the judge gave a sentence that was too harsh considering the circumstances, or if he went against previously established precedent. New evidence is a key item in a criminal charge, but it cannot have been available at the time of the previous trial.
How does a precedent create new laws?
== ==
What happen in 1946 in World War 2?
In 1946, World War II had ended, with the defeat of the Axis powers. The Nuremberg Trials were held to prosecute war criminals, and the Nuremberg principles were established, laying the groundwork for international law and human rights. The United Nations was also founded in 1945 as a response to the devastation of the war, with its headquarters established in New York City.
What is a decision in a case that sets forth a new legal principle establishing a precedent?
Ratio decidendi sets forth the legal reasoning for the decision in a case. (Obiter dictum is a judicial opinion or incidental comment that is not legally binding.)
What factors does a judge consider when there is no precedent?
While it is possible for there to be no exact precedent, in those cases he would simply look for similar situations and judge on that. He may also ask himself whether this is the time and place for some new and groundbreaking precendent to be established, though that is rare. Finally, he may consider the likelihood of being overturned.
What is a new trial location?
what is a new trial location called????? what is a new trial location called????? Change of venue
What happens if the judges on court of appeals decide a trial was unfair?
Actually a court of appeals cannot decide that. A court of appeals can only decide whether or not the trial court correctly followed procedures and existing legal precedence. It is entirely possible for procedures and legal precedence to be completely unfair (they have been many times) but if the trial court properly followed them, the court of appeals must support the trial court's decision. If the court of appeals decides that the trial court failed to follow procedures and/or existing legal precedent, then the case must be retried in a trial court.
How are a mistrial and a new trial alike?
Both involve a legal proceeding being stopped and restarted. A mistrial occurs when the original trial is terminated due to a serious error or issue, while a new trial is scheduled to start fresh after the first trial's outcome is overturned. In both cases, the aim is to ensure a fair legal process and outcome for all parties involved.
