0
Scholars have established that Matthew and Luke relied on the Gospel According to Mark for their knowledge about the life and death of Jesus. Whenever they both agree with Mark, the texts uses almost identical words in Greek. Moreover, the Missing Gap (sometimes called the Great Omission) demonstrates conclusively that for Luke, Mark was not just his best source on the life of Jesus, it was his only source.
Matthew and Luke shared another source, as well as Mark's Gospel. Whenever they agreed with each other on a saying that was not in Mark, they used the same Greek words, but placed the saying or parable in a quite different context and time in the life of Jesus. From this, scholars have been able to establish that they must have relied on a common sayings document, now called the 'Q' document, or 'Q' gospel. There is sufficient evidence in the two New Testament gospels, that scholars have been able to put together the probable wording and even sequence of verses in the hypothetical 'Q' document.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How many parallel verses are there in the synoptic gospels?
The synoptic gospels are those attributed to Matthew, Mark and Luke. Their parallel verses are documented in the Harmony of the Gospels section of The New Strong's Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible published by Thomas Nelson Publishers, whose bibles also often contain this material, which covers the parallel verses of the four canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Since not all of the hundreds of parallels are contained in all three synoptic Gospels, an answer cannot be given as to the actual number, but following is a possible explanation for the parallel verses. The Gospel According to Mark was written in Greek, the universal language of the time, by an anonymous author who is commonly known as Saint Mark. The Gospel According to Mark was attributed to John Mark (also believed to be Marcus, son of the apostle Peter - I Pet. 5:13, KJV Bible, also Markus and Mark in other versions) beginning around 100 A.D. The Gospels According to Saints Matthew and Luke were written by anonymous authors and later attributed to Matthew and Luke. None of the synoptic gospel authors claimed to have been the persons traditionally associated with these gospels, or even to have been first-hand witnesses or to have known first-hand witnesses. 'Luke' went as far as to state that what he was writing was 'what we believe of things delivered to us by those who were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word from the beginning'. According to some scholars, the Gospels of Matthew and Luke main source of information on the life of Jesus was Mark's Gospel. Other scholars believe Mark's Gospel was based upon Matthew's Gospel. Some scholars believe the Gospels of Matthew and Luke used a hypothetical 'sayings of Jesus' document called the 'Q' document as a source for some of the sayings they attribute to Jesus. Although 'Q' is hypothetical, as there exists no early copy of it, and none of the early Church Fathers ever referred to it, scholars believe they may have been able to reconstruct much of its content by studying the Gospels. The supposition of the 'Q' document derived from the fact that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke reported many of the same sayings of Jesus, but maintained the sayings were uttered during different times and events in Jesus' ministry. Whenever the Gospels of Matthew and Luke agree upon a saying, the Greek text for that saying was the same in both gospels. The Gospel of Mark appears to have made little or no use of 'Q'.
Which gospels are synoptic gospels?
A:The first three gospels are often referred to as the synoptic gospels. This is because the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke have many of the same stories, often in same sequence (although not always). There are even ocasions where they use the exact same wording. A:The Synoptic Gospels are Matthew, Mark and Luke. They are called synoptic because they are intriguingly similar and intriguingly different. The most common theory is that Mark is the oldest of these, and Matthew and Luke in various ways used Mark along with other material to create their individual narratives.Scholars believe that this other material consisted of material unique to each of Matthew and Luke (ie material they wrote themselves - called 'M' and 'L') and further material that is common to both Matthew and Luke but not found in Mark. This material consists mostly of the sayings of Jesus and scholars now believe that this came from a now lost source called 'Q' (from the German 'Quelle' meaning 'source').Other theories - for example, that Matthew (or Luke) is the oldest Gospel and Mark wrote his account later leaving outchunks of material was once a common belief, but modern textual criticism suggests that Mark was the first gospel to have been written with additions made by Luke and Matthew.
Why use the two source hypothesis?
The two source hypothesis is an explanation for the synoptic problem, the pattern of similarities and the differences between the three gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. It emerged in the 19th century.
What is known as the Book of Gospels?
There are four books in the New Testament known as "the gospels". They are the Gospel according to Matthew, the Gospel according to Mark, the Gospel according to Luke and the Gospel according to John. In Roman Catholic tradition, they are considered the heart of the Bible, because they tell us about the birth, life, mission, death and resurrection of Jesus. In Catholic liturgy, use may sometimes made of a book that contains only the four gospels and not the rest of the bible or even the rest of the New Testament. This book would be called a Book of Gospels.
What does synoptic mean when referring to the christian gospels?
A:The word synoptic means 'seen with the same eye' and can refer to many different things such as synoptic weather charts. In a religious context, it refers to the close similarities among the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke - the synoptic gospels. When the synoptic gospels are looked at in parallel - synoptically - in the original Greek language, it soon becomes apparent that there is a literary dependency among the three gospels. New Testament scholars say that Mark's Gospel was written first, approximately 70 CE, and that Matthew and Lukewere largely based on Mark's original Gospel. There are further similarities between Matthew and Luke only, which have been traced back to the hypothetical 'Q' document.
What did William R Farmer disagree with?
Until his death, William R. Farmer was the leading advocate of the Two Gospel (neo-Griesbach) Hypothesis, i. e. the view that Matthew wrote the first of the canonical gospels; Luke made use of Matthew and other source material in producing the second, now canonical, gospel; and Mark conflated Matthew and Luke in writing the third of the canonical gospels.William R. Farmer then disagreed with other synoptic source hypothesis, particularly, with the Two Document hypothesis, which claims that Mark wrote the first gospel and Matthew and Luke made independent use of Mark and hypothetical source, originally simply called Q (short for the German word for "source" Quelle, but which now more popularly carries the title, "The Sayings Gospel, Q."
What are the literary relationships of the synoptic Gospels?
A:Matthew, Mark and Luke are often referred to as the synoptic gospels, a term which means 'seeing with the same eye', because of their similarities and particularly their frequent use of exactly the same Greek text. For example, whenever Matthew and Luke agree with Mark, they do so in the same sequence and often in exactly the same words in the Greek language, clear evidence of copying. All the New Testament gospels were written anonymously in Greek. In spite of this, the second-century Church Fathers attributed two of them to disciples who likely had no knowledge of the Greek language (Matthew and John) and two to companions of Paul (Mark and Luke). Modern biblical scholars say that there is no good reason to accept those attributions, and that we do not really know who wrote the gospels.The second-century Church Fathers realised that there was a literary dependency among the three synoptic gospels, as they found by parallel readings in the Greek language. By the end of the second century they had formed the opinion that Matthew was written first, and that Mark and Luke were derived by copying Matthew's Gospel. Modern scholars agree there is a clear literary dependency, but have demonstrated that Mark was first and that the authors of Matthew and Luke relied on Mark for their knowledge of the life and mission of Jesus.Matthew and Luke shared a further source, the hypothetical 'Q' document, for sayings material attributed to Jesus. Some other material in Luke's Gospel might have been inspired by the works of the Jewish historian, Josephus. There is additional material unique to each of Matthew and Luke, for which there is no known source, and which some scholars believe not to reflect real, historical events.The consensus of biblical scholars is that Mark's Gospel was written approximately 70 CE. Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says that Mark seems to depend on traditions (and perhaps already shaped sources) received in Greek, however we do not know the origins or form of these traditions.Matthew was written in the eighties of the first century, although Brown suggests that several years should be allowed either side of that decade. Luke is believed to have been written in the nineties or early in the second century. Luke's Gospel is also interesting because it was the main source of material used by the author of John's Gospel.
What is synoptic problem and its solution?
The synoptic problem is the puzzle of explaining the similarities and differences between the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke). The two-source hypothesis is a widely accepted solution to the synoptic problem, proposing that both Matthew and Luke used Mark's Gospel as well as another common source known as Q (from the German word Quelle, meaning "source") when writing their Gospels.
Was the lineage of Jesus according to Matthew and Luke incorrect?
Yes. The genealogies of Jesus are among the known errors in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke.Each gospel says that its genealogy is the male line back through Jesus' father Joseph (Matthew 1:16, Luke 3:23), but Matthew says that Joseph's father was Jacob, while Luke says that his father was called Heli. Both say that Joseph was descended from the great Zorobabel, son of Salathiel, but Matthew says that Salathiel's father was Jechonias, while Luke says that he was called Neri. Both use numerology to 'prove' that Jesus was destined for greatness, but to do this Matthew had to omit three kings recorded in the Old Testament, and Luke had to insert his own fictitious people into the Old Testament list.Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says, in typical understatement, that while Luke's list may be less classically monarchical than Matthew's, there is little likelihood that either is strictly historical.
Why are the synoptic gospels called synoptic?
The synoptic gospels are called synoptic because they share a similar perspective and structure, allowing for easy comparison of the parallel accounts of Jesus' life, teachings, and miracles. The word "synoptic" comes from a Greek term meaning "seen together," highlighting the commonalities in content and order among Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
How many times is the word Hope is use Matthew Mark Luke?
It is used about 100 times.
Was the birth of Jesus Christ the only recorded virgin birth?
A:The answer to this must look at two issues: the record of Jesus' birth and the record of other virgin births. The only known record of the life of Jesus is in the gospels, so we need to look at the provenance of the gospels. In spite of the gospels being named after the apostles Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, they were actually written anonymously long after the death of Jesus and only assigned to the apostles whose names they now bear, later in the second century. We also know that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were substantially based on the Gospel of Mark, as evidenced in part by the use of the same words in the Greek language. Matthew, for example, has some 600 of the 666 verses in Mark. From this, we can say that the authors of Matthew and Luke learnt everything they knew about the life and mission of Jesus from Mark's Gospel.The Gospels of Matthew and Luke both tell us of the virgin birth of Jesus, but they did not find this in Mark's Gospel, nor in the 'Q' document which they also used as a source of sayings attributed to Jesus. Moreover, the two nativity accounts are so entirely contradictory that they could not really be historically true. The consensus of biblical scholars is that the two authors created the accounts of a virgin birth because this was needed if Christianity was to compete in a pagan world.As for other virgin births, there were many recorded in the pagan world. By the first century CE, gods and god-men were almost expected to be born from virgin mothers. The question becomes not how many there were, but would the reader believe in any of them. And then, should the reader believe in the virgin birth of Jesus.
