Mercutio challenged Tybalt to a fight when there was no need to do so. Indeed Mercutio was spoiling for a fight with him from the start. When Tybalt asks if he can have a word with Mercutio, Mercutio says, "why not couple it with something? Why not make it a word and a blow?" which is about a provocative as you could get.
It is Mercutio who begins fighting Tybalt when Romeo refuses to engage. Mercutio's actions lead to his own death at the hands of Tybalt.
Death is a part of life itself, albeit the last part. It is not a disaster by any definition on its own.
In Shakespeare's time, cars didn't even exist.
No. The property you own in life or in death makes up your estate.
benvolio and romeo are cousins and mercutio is Romeo's best friend
brutus
"A plague on both your houses" is spoken by Mercutio in the Shakespeare play 'Romeo and Juliet'. Mercutio speaks these words as he realises he is dying, placing the blame of his demise upon both the Capulet and Montague families.
It's a pun because Mercutio wasn't a serious man, and grave has 2 meanings: 1. serious, 2. burial site. This pun is used by Mercutio when he gets wounded by the sword and is dying, so even though the phraseology "grave man" indicates that he is referring to himself as serious, he is actually referring to himself as dead... a man in a grave.
Hamlet
He is calling a plague down on both the Montagues and the Capulets because their feud has led to his death
Romeo's part in the Friar's plan is to fake his own death by drinking a potion that will make him appear lifeless. The Friar's plan is for Romeo to be placed in the Capulet tomb until Juliet can join him there after faking her own death.
I looked up this question because I had the same thought rewatching this film today. It's interesting that in Shakespeare's play, Mercutio clearly wants to pick a fight from the moment the Capulets walk in, baiting Tybalt - who initially doesn't bite - and eventually outright challenging him to the duel in which he is killed. In the play, he does this because he's disgusted with what he sees as Romeo's 'cowardly' response to Tybalt's challenge; however, Luhrmann's film makes a big change here. In the film, Tybalt and his thugs are literally beating Romeo up (there is no indication that this happens in the play), and Mercutio's motivation is clearly to save him from the beating. So why throw down his gun first? It's not entirely clear, but it seems to me that Luhrmann's version of Mercutio, unlike Shakespeare's, does not intend for this to be a fight to the death. Instead, he grabs a makeshift club and jumps into the fight in order to beat Tybalt back off Romeo. There may be other interpretations, but I can't see how else to read this strange and very deliberate piece of adaptation. It certainly makes his death more tragic - he's killed defending Romeo's life, whereas in the play, it seems all he was defending was some sense of honur - his own or Romeo's, it's hard to tell.