0
What part of the new constitution did federalists and anti-federalists disagree on?
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
because they thought differently
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why might the anti federalists have wanted a bill of rights in the document?
The Constitution was originally written with no amendments. The part before the Bill of Rights has everything about how to run a government and nothing guaranteeing the rights of any citizen. The antifederalists wanted a Bill of Rights to ensure the Constitution guaranteed rights to citizens.
How did the anti federalists writings influence the democratic government?
Anti-Federalists were responsible for defending states rights. Though they are the group that "lost" the debate regarding the United States Constitution, they are an important group in American history that has not only been overlooked, but may have been misnamed. During the time of the Anti-Federalists, members were concerned that the U.S. Constitution would create an overbearing central government. Though this did not happen, the Anti-Federalists were not in the wrong with their worries. This essay topic reviews an important part of the U.S. Constitution history.
What argument did federalists have about the Bill of Rights?
There are a couple of important perspectives when discussing the Bill of Rights in reference to the Federalists (Washington/Hamilton/Jay/Madison, et al.) and the anti-Federalists (George Mason, Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, George Clinton, et al.). Thomas Jefferson was in Paris the whole time the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights were considered, though he ended up leading the anti-Federalist party within a couple of years of his return to the States.Back in 1776 when the states declared independence, they each set up a state constitution and most included a bill of rights. The anti-Federalists were anti-U.S. Constitution because they believed in strong state's rights and a weak central government...therefore the Articles of Confederation were sufficient to their ends. In part, the lack of a Bill of Rights was a reason to delay ratification of the U.S. Constitution. They were trying to call for a second Constitutional Convention before any ratification could proceed.The Federalists had their hands full in trying to get the U.S. Constitution ratified, so they felt the Constitution should be ratified and then amend it with a bill of rights. The two big states leaders in Virginia and New York were determined to defeat the Constitution. Another Federalist position was: All rights not defined in the Constitution then remain with the states and the people. They were concerned that if you start naming these rights, then it worked in reverse - that you would only have the rights that were listed...it was solved when Amendment #9 was added: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Also, Amendment #10 was included: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.This addressed the concerns of the Federalists and the anti-Federalists. It was adopted by the U.S. Congress in 1789 and sent to the states for ratification which was ratified by the states in 1791.
What is the difference between federalist and anti federalist?
There were many, but it can be summarized as such: Federalists believed in a stronger centralized government and that the states were essentially part of one union that could enact laws upon all states. This party was primarily driven by Alexander Hamilton who correctly saw the need for this to happen from a economic stand-point, to pay off America's early debt and to establish a unified currency. The Anti-Federalists believed in strong states rights and a very minimalist federal government for many reasons. One such was a rational fear that a central government's president might be thought of as a King; whom they had just fought a revolutionary war against. Eventually the less-popular Federalists lost their power and for a period of time America had a one-party system within the Anti-Federalist party called the Democrat Republicans.
What important part of the constitution states why the Constitution was written?
The preamble
What part of the us constitution did the antifederalists think was needed?
The Bill of Rights, :)
Why might the anti federalists have wanted a bill of rights in the document?
The Constitution was originally written with no amendments. The part before the Bill of Rights has everything about how to run a government and nothing guaranteeing the rights of any citizen. The antifederalists wanted a Bill of Rights to ensure the Constitution guaranteed rights to citizens.
Why might the anti-federalists have wanted the bill of rights in the documents?
The Constitution was originally written with no amendments. The part before the Bill of Rights has everything about how to run a government and nothing guaranteeing the rights of any citizen. The antifederalists wanted a Bill of Rights to ensure the Constitution guaranteed rights to citizens.
What are the anti-federalist criticism of the constitution?
There were many colonists that were known as federalists,who approved of the constitution and set out to defend it against all its opponents who were known as anti-federalists. It would stop all things the were trying to do in part of the nation they had problems getting there own laws approved.
What was passed in 1789 keeping a promise made by Federalists during ratification of the Constitution?
The 10 Amendments which are called the Bill of Rights were approved and became part of the Constitution.
The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution in part as a way to garner support from the Anti-Federalists for the ratification of the Constitution?
the bill of rights was added to coax the anti federalists, or jeffersonians. they needed just one more state to ratify the constitution so they decided that a bill of rights was a good request to accept.
Why did the farmers of the constitution base the new government of federalism?
The framers of the Constitution, for the most part, believed that a strong central government was necessary. There were several anti federalists that did not believe that ideal.
What were the amendments and why did anti-federalists think they were needed?
The amendments are a change or minor improvement within the government. They believed that the power of the states would be destroyed by the new Constitution.
Why did the farmers of the constitution base the new plan of government of federalism?
The framers of the Constitution, for the most part, believed that a strong central government was necessary. There were several anti federalists that did not believe that ideal.
How did the anti federalists writings influence the democratic government?
Anti-Federalists were responsible for defending states rights. Though they are the group that "lost" the debate regarding the United States Constitution, they are an important group in American history that has not only been overlooked, but may have been misnamed. During the time of the Anti-Federalists, members were concerned that the U.S. Constitution would create an overbearing central government. Though this did not happen, the Anti-Federalists were not in the wrong with their worries. This essay topic reviews an important part of the U.S. Constitution history.
What is the difference between the bill of rights and the constitution?
The Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution. It is the name for the first ten amendments of the Constitution.
Who was a part of the anti-federalists?
patrick henry
