found in cold regions, mostly north of the Arctic Circle (Arctic tundra) or above the timberline on high mountains (alpine tundra).
the three parts of the earth are: 1. the crust 2. the mantle and 3. the core
you would draw it
The tundra is frozen land in the subarctic regions, and sequesters absolutely huge amounts of carbon as frozen vegetation. Any threat to the tundra is a threat to human society. If global warming reaches the point where the tundra begins to melt, the vegetation would begin to rot, giving off large amount of carbon dioxide. This carbon dioxide would contribute to further global warming, which in turn would melt further areas of tundra. This results in a runaway effect known as positive feedback, whereby any increase in temperature results in a further increase in temperature.
Time difference on Earth depends on which parts of the earth are facing the sun, the parts facing directly too the sun would be in mid day/12am and the opposite side of this would me at midnight/12pm and so on.
global warming
Northern or Southern edges of the earth far away from the equator.
Arizona has deserts. Alaska has taiga and tundra.
The tundra is located in territories and provinces all over the world. The tundra covers an estimated 20 percent of the earth. Alaska, Northern Canada, Russia, Greenland, and Northern Scandinavia are places the tundra can be found.
Mammals and birds both do well in the tundra. Fish, reptiles and amphibians--not so much. The best answer would probably be 'warm blooded'.
the tundra is located in the north pole and can be located in antartica
If the tundra didn't exist then many of the animals wouldn't be able to adapt to another environment and they would become extinct. Also the worlds water table would be thrown to a high dangerous level because many of the worlds glaciers come from the tundra. This would also make a warmer climate because no cooling of earth from the frozen tundra.
I'm sorry, but I think you messed up your question. And I think you meant 'grazing animals', but whatever. If you did mean grazing and this is the question you meant to say then good. What would happen if the tundra became overpopulated with grazing animals? Well, if that's your question then heres the answer. The tundra doesnt have many plants, so I don't think there would be a huge difference, but some animals would die because of the very few plants the tundra does have being trampled by the grazing animals.
That would have to be parts of the Antarctic continent.
Then the same side of the Earth would always be directed at the Moon. In this case, from some parts of Earth, the Moon would always be above the horizon; from other parts, it would never be visible.
Tundra would be found around Fairbanks.
Well the north pole itself is made of water/ice there is no land there. So your best bet to find a lot of tundra and ice would probably be norther Russia.
Very far south. It is cold and so then the latitude will probably be negative. If you thought it would be positive, you are crazy.