answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In defense of lawsuits and other challenges to President Lincoln's authority to suspend any part of the US Constitution, his counsel stated that the US president, the Constitution contemplated and tacitly provided that the president should be a dictator and that all or any parts of the US Constitution can be suspended if a president believed the nation was in great danger. On this premise, Lincoln, for all practical purposes believed that his authority as a dictator was proper under the Constitution.The US Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision said that Lincoln's actions were in a manner of speaking "OK". The Court did so on narrow grounds and made no attempt to justify Lincoln's idea that allowed a president to make unconstitutional acts constitutional.

However, when a president was acting as commander in chief, a president in the actions required to end an insurrection, any president could decide on his own had wide sweeping authority.

Historians say that President Lincoln understood that any of his "decrees" could be subverted, and kept a careful eye on his subordinates as they enforced his decrees, trying at all times to assure the Congress, the nation and himself, that his suspensions of various constitutional were not abusive.

As it was, keeping tabs on the actions of subordinates was difficult and any number of persons were falsely accused of spying, or committing other acts that they never committed. Abuses did happen,

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

The part of the US Constitution that President Lincoln suspended during the US Civil War was Habeas Corpus. It was suspended in 1861 and restored in 1866.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did the US Supreme Court rule on the authority of US President Lincoln to suspend the US Constitution during the US Civil War?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Where does the President derive these powers from?

The president gets his authority from the US Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court. Conducting foreign policy is one of his duties, to be shared with the US Senate.


Who has the authority to decide if the president's actions exceed the the powers of the executive branch?

supreme court


What is the supreme law of the land having final authority over all else?

The Supreme Law of the Land Is the Constitution. And the Constitution has all the laws In it so it has overall authority.


Why doesn't the US President have the authority to reverse a Supreme Court decision?

The President (Executive Branch) doesn't have the authority to reverse a Supreme Court (Judicial Branch) decision because such action would violate the separation of powers established by the Constitution. If the President had that kind of "veto authority" over a Supreme Court decision he (or she) would effectively control two branches of the government and would be vested with too much power.


Who have final authority to interpret constitution of India?

Supreme Court


What is the ultimate authority on what is or isn't allowed by the constitution?

The US Supreme Court


How did the US Supreme Court's ruling against President Truman and the steel industry lawsuit bring two opposing views of presidential power to the forefront of presidential decrees?

The seizure of the nation's steel mills by President Harry Truman was declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court. This decision brought to the forefront two opposing views about the US Constitution. Truman's view was that a president had legal authority, inherent in the Constitution to act on his own to protect the nation. This meant on both international and domestic affairs. President Lincoln used this "authority" many times during the US Civil War. However, the Court saw things differently in Truman's day. In this case, no situation, no matter how dire, can be a cause to violate the Constitution.


By what authority was the US Supreme Court established?

The ratification of the US Constitution in 1789.


Who is the highest judicial authority provided by the Ilinois constitution?

The Illinois Supreme Court


What authority is given to government agencies to interpret the constitution?

Interpretation is left up to the Supreme Court and other lower courts. Agencies have no authority to interpret the Constitution.


Who has the final authority to interpret the US Constitution?

The Judicial Branch of government is vested with the authority to interpret the Constitution and ensure that laws adhere to the spirit and letter of the Constitution. It is also responsible for determining how a laws are interpreted and applied.As the highest court in the nation, the US Supreme Courtis the ultimate authority on the interpretation of laws and the Constitution.However, through the system of checks and balances, the Supreme Court does not have the final say on what the Constitution is. The Congress, with the several States, has the authority to amend (change) the Constitution, thus potentially overturning a Supreme Court decision. This is a difficult and time-consuming thing to accomplish and so is not often done.


Who is the key stone of Indian constitution?

Supreme Court is the guardian of Indian constitution.