john Locke believed that monarchs are not chosen by God but by the consent of the governed in order to protect natural rights. He argued that individuals have certain inherent rights, such as life, liberty, and property, which the government is obligated to protect.
Thomas Hobbes believed that monarchs derive their authority from the consent of the governed rather than being chosen by God. He argued that political legitimacy comes from a social contract among individuals in a society.
Hobbes believed in a social contract theory where individuals agree to give up some freedoms in exchange for a secure society governed by a sovereign. Bossuet believed in the divine right of kings, asserting that monarchs were appointed by God and were accountable only to God, not to the people. Hobbes focused on the importance of a strong central authority to maintain order, while Bossuet emphasized the absolute authority of the monarchy based on divine right.
James I was a devout believer in the divine right of kings, which held that monarchs derived their authority from God. He believed in the Anglican Church and opposed the Puritans. James also believed in the importance of maintaining peace within his kingdom, which influenced his foreign policy decisions.
Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. This view influenced his argument that monarchs needed absolute power to maintain order and prevent chaos in society, as individuals could not be trusted to govern themselves. Monarchs were seen as necessary to impose order and control over a potentially unruly and selfish population.
Absolute monarchs believed in the divine right to rule and concentrated power in their own hands, while Enlightenment thinkers promoted the idea of individual rights, liberty, and the need for a system of checks and balances in government. They challenged the traditional belief in absolute authority and advocated for greater political participation and representation of the people.
Thomas Hobbes believed that monarchs derive their authority from the consent of the governed rather than being chosen by God. He argued that political legitimacy comes from a social contract among individuals in a society.
There have been many monarchs in history who believed they governed because God willed it. This was known as the Divine Right of Kings.
protection
The monarchs of Europe believed that they were divinely chosen.
the monarchs
Only to God. They believed they ruled by Divine Right.
monarchs or pages
believed in the divine right of kings and some had to work hard to maintain control of their kingdoms. Few had enough wealth to keep their own army.
By autocratic monarchs called tsars (analog of the Western European kings).
many believed that's what god wanted.
The colonies were governed either directly or indirectly by the mother country, protected by the mother country, and the monarchs were leaders of the colonies.
They were the absolute rulers/monarchs of their country and, in additon, were believed to be descendants of Gods.