No. Not at all. Star Trek is a COMPLETELY different franchise than star wars
star trek
He is put in a modified photon torpedo tube a shot down to the surface of the Genesis planet at the end of Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan. He is then retrieved from the Genesis planet and revived in Star Trek 3: The Search For Spock
There are hundreds of Star Trek books, novels & books about the show itself.Do a search for List of Star Trek Novels and you'll find a comprehensive list.
In order Star Trek: The Motion Picture Star Trek: The Wrath of Kahn Star Trek: The Search for Spock Star Trek: The Voyage Home Star Trek: The Final Frontier Star Trek: The Undiscovered Country Star Trek: Generations Star Trek: First Contact Star Trek: Insurrection Star Trek: Nemesis Star Trek (plain and simple Star Trek)
Star Trek , Star Wars , Planet of Blood ,
They both have different planets. They do not have a planet that is on both!
The TV show Star Trek was first made in 1966 but the first Star Wars film cam out in May 25 , 1977, while the first Star Trek film came out in December 7, 1979
Star wars was first in 1976. Star Trek the Motion Picture was in 1980.
Look to the links below for both Star Trek and Star Wars autographs .
Depends on what you like the most. But since I've never seen Star Trek, I would choose Star Wars. And from what I've heard of Star Trek, personally, it doesn't sound nowhere near thrilling as Star Wars (no offense to people who are Trek fans)
No. He was in star wars.
Star Wars and Indiana Jones were created by George Lucas. Star Trek was created by Gene Roddenberry.
Star wars could easily when in a battle with star trek. Star wars has massive ships and fleets which could easily destroy anything from star trek, and if something did get through star wars massive fleet the 2nd death star could blow the remaining star trek fleet to Timbuktu.
star wars
The French also call it "Star Wars" but in french star wars is "Guerres des Étoiles"
No. Not at all. Star Trek is a COMPLETELY different franchise than star wars