Judges are accountable to their Senior Judges and Criminal Justice System of India. India is a Democratic and Republic of India has givern powers to Judiciary of India to stay indeperndent. To learn more please visit Judiciary system of India.
if you are talking about judges for the supreme court then under Article II of the US constitution it states the powers and duties of the president. one of those powers is to appoint judges to the supreme court
Most federal judges retire from full time service and become senior judges. Senior judges are still federal judges and eligible to earn a full salary. They do continue to hear cases under a reduced caseload. Essentially they are still working partime. This comes from US Code 371, Part 1, Chapter 17.
magistrates.
Their clients, the senior partners in their firm, Judges, the state bar association...
magistrates.
The hierarchy of judicial system in the United States has the senior judges at the top. They are followed by the chief judges, and finally the clerk of courts.
Assign judges, interpret laws
Judges can be disciplined through a variety of methods, including formal complaints or investigations by judicial conduct commissions, suspension or removal by a higher court, or impeachment by a legislative body. Disciplinary actions aim to hold judges accountable for misconduct or ethical violations and maintain public trust in the judiciary.
Judges interpret the laws and legislators (or politicians) enact the laws. The separation of powers requires that the judiciary and the legislative branches remain separate, and accordingly judges should remain politically neutral.
department heads, ambassadors, and federal judges
Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that says that judges should hesitate to strike down a law unless it is obviously unconstitutional. This encourages judges to limit their own powers.