Want this question answered?
they sucked the power
it was not detailed. it left congress weak and power less. the states were in control.
Fatman
The one obstacle to approving the Articles of Confederation was that some states refused to relinquish their claims west of the Appalachians. Doing this would have left the settlers in a financial limbo.
Executive and Judicial Branch
But the Articles left most important powers to the states. These powers included the authority to set taxes and enforce national laws. The Articles proposed to leave the states in control of the lands west of the Appalachian Mountains .
The articles of confederation gave power to the states and left very little power for the federal government.
To much power was left to the states and enouugh power was left to congress
they sucked the power
slavery, drugs and animals
it was not detailed. it left congress weak and power less. the states were in control.
The Articles of Confederation was a very poor document. Its overall structure gave too much power to individual states which left the national government weak and unable to effectively carry through with anything.
Fatman
The one obstacle to approving the Articles of Confederation was that some states refused to relinquish their claims west of the Appalachians. Doing this would have left the settlers in a financial limbo.
Executive and Judicial Branch
Yes. The Articles of Confederation gave the states within the union almost unlimited power. This means that the national/central government was left with very little power. Probably the main reason that the Articles of Confederation was eliminated is that the central government had too little power to be effective at anything. It couldn't even coin money or regulate interstate trade, so any state could theoretically make their own money and put astronomical taxes on goods from other states.
concurrent