The finding in the Dred Scott vs Sanford case was tha when a slave master took a slave tho the north, the slave was notautomaticaly freed and furthermore that slaves were not people, but property.
The Dred Scott vs. Sanford case was decided in March of 1857 by the United State Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney. In this decision, it was declared that all blacks, slaves as well as free , were not and could never become citizens of the United States.
the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states
The South loved it because it appeared to make slavery legal in every state of the Union.
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Scott wasd denied his freedom. The Court interpreted the Constitution to mean that slavery was legal in every state of the Union, because it said a man's property was sacred, and slaves were property.
The principle of judicial review, allowing courts to review the constitutionality of laws, was established in the landmark case Marbury v. Madison in 1803 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Marshall's decision asserted the Court's authority to determine the constitutionality of congressional acts, setting an important precedent for the judiciary's role in interpreting the Constitution.
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
Roger Taney
nothing it was a complete misunderstanding and it never happen
The Dred Scott v. Sanford decision.
the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Dred Scott v. Sanford
He was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision.
The decision made slavery legal in all U.S. territories that were not yet states.
The Dred Scott vs. Sanford case was decided in March of 1857 by the United State Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney. In this decision, it was declared that all blacks, slaves as well as free , were not and could never become citizens of the United States.
Dred Scott v. Sandford,* 60 US 393 (1857)*Sandford is misspelled in the court documents; the respondent's real last name was Sanford.