The problems are many, but let's just leave it at the basic science, and not get into a larger worldview set of issues. The only reason to have that discussion here would be because subscribing to Darwin's theory would keep you from denying the existence of a creator, and therefore your world view would be different, but that would then be suggesting other world views to counter this one.
As we clearly see from the example above, the problems are NOT scientific, but cultural. Social turmoil was created as Darwin's theory overturned the popularly accepted religious account of origins. This same sort of upheaval occurred three hundred years earlier when Galileo overturned the religiously based geocentric model of our solar system, in essence "dethroning" man from his exalted place in the heavenly scheme of things.
At the time that Darwin published his work the theory of genetic transfer of characteristics by Gregor Mendel had not been published. As a consequence genetic theory, mutations, recessive characteristics and allof those issues would be unknown.
Evolution is the change in allele frequency (genotype) over time in a population of organisms resulting in alterations of the phenotype. Change over time gives rise to the diversity of species.The theory of evolution by natural selection is the nonrandom survival and reproductive success of randomly varying organisms. This is the main adaptive driver of evolution and can lead to speciation. All organisms are variations and the environment, the natural selector, preferentially chooses those with beneficial traits to be reproductively successful in the immediate environment at a greater rate than their fellow population members. As their descendents possess these traits, the alleles shift in the population gene pool and evolution occurs. Gene flow and genetic drift also cause evolution, especially in small populations, but they are not adaptive drivers.Basically, theory of evolution is the theory that explains the diversity of life. Many believe the father of evolution was Comte de Buffon, a French naturalist. However, he was unable to come up with a reasonable mechanism that drives evolution. Charles Darwin later came up with natural selection as the mechanism that drives evolution and wrote about it in his book On the Origin of Species.
Natural Selection is what Darwin believed was the cause of evolution.
It can
Mutation is the cause of evolution. Mutation is what creates differences in individuals within a species, leading to diversion. Then "survival of the fittest" can occur.
cause evolution is only a theory, that's why.
the kinetic moecular theory
Darwin's theory of evolution contradicts the literal interpretation of creation as taken from The Bible
Jean Lamarck's theory of evolution is known as zoological philosophy or the inheritance of acquired characteristics, and stated that changes to an organisms phenotype (basically what it looks like) will cause changes to it's genotype (DNA). This has been disproved of by modern scientists, with natural selection as the main theory.
fixation
No, natural selection is believed to result in evolution.
Answer:Evolution is a theory put forward by Charles Darwin. Some claim erroneously that he eventually discarded his own theory of evolution. One has to take into consideration that evolution is taking place, but it is the law of evolution which doubted by those who reject evolution. Men today are much taller, fitter and we live longer. Girls become women at an earlier age. This, according to some people, is the law of evolution. This phenomenon is not necessarily part of Darwin's theory. According to some, we did not evolve but were the sons and daughters of God. According to people who believe this, it was He who organized the first man and the first woman from elements that were already available to Him.Another Answer:Most all religious fundamentalists reject evolution and at present a growing number of scientists also differ.Another View:Religious people might take evolutionary theory - or any scientific theory, for that matter - as an affront to themselves, their beliefs, or their gods. This is because scientific explanations are not required to pay hommage to gods without evidence that such gods were involved or even exist, a property of science that might cause religiously-minded people to think of scientific theories as 'atheistic'.
not by itself
Catholic AnswerThere were many problems on both sides. Galileo had no proof but refused to publish his theory as just a theory. In addition, he had a belligerent attitude and went so far as to deliberately alienate the Pope, who was a personal friend of his. The Church believed that the heliocentric theory contradicted Sacred Scripture and would pose innumerable problems if it was published as fact.
At the time that Darwin published his work the theory of genetic transfer of characteristics by Gregor Mendel had not been published. As a consequence genetic theory, mutations, recessive characteristics and allof those issues would be unknown.
they cause no problems
Evolution.