crucifying, arena
What were the punishments for smuggling in 1700
Mostly it was just robberies, murders, grave robbing, tomb raiding, stuff like that. Most of the problems came from the tomb raiding, but their punishment came from some of the booby traps that were laid inside of the pyramids or alternate passageways. Robberies and murders were usually treated with the "eye for an eye" code (IE: Code of Hammurabi).
It depends upon whether or not you can learn from what you did to receive the punishments or not and if you had received rewards for having learned from past punishments, if that is the case, then it would be better to be receiving rewards presently, if not, hopefully, because you would be receiving punishments you will learn from it and then it would be better to be receiving punishments, as long as they're for good reasons.
There are a couple of reasons as to why punishments are imposed. one may include deterrence.
well i think it was all Hammurabi i think he made the punishments in mesopotamia ya
be3cause they are nutters be3cause they are nutters
It varied. The Greeks usually were fairly mild in their punishments, certain Arabs killed them, as did the Romans and Chinese.
The city of Rome did have a police force. It was created by Augustus. The Romans did have prisons. However, prisons sentences were very uncommon. The Romans had other types of punishments. The prison were used for those awaiting a trial or a death sentence.
After the slaughter of the Iceni in the final battle, the Romans treated them very harshly as punishment and revenge for their atrocities. In time, the punishments wore off, a new governor was appointed and the Iceni were absorbed into the Roman population.
Uncivilised The Romans were uncivilised when it came to living. The rich Romans lived a luxurious life living in a in a big house. They had slaves to accomplish all of there needs. On the other hand, the slaves were all crammed into one room for the night. They were not treating them fairly. The Romans had a great way of entertainment, however, it was considered uncivilized because it threatened some people with possible death. It was called Gladiators. It involved 1 slave fighting against a lion or a similar animal which then ended in the slave dying.
There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.There were no unusual punishments in Roman times --- at least not to the Romans. To us some of the punishments are horrible. The Romans tried to make the punishment fit the crime as far as they were able. For example, someone convicted of arson was put in a tunic covered with a flammable substance, hung on a post and then set on fire. Someone convicted of dishonoring the gods to the detriment of the state was sentenced "to the beasts". Murderers were many times sentenced to fight in the arena, one opponent at a time until they were killed. In addition, a criminal suffered the extra humiliation of being executed in full view of the general public.
What were the punishments for smuggling in 1700
Mostly it was just robberies, murders, grave robbing, tomb raiding, stuff like that. Most of the problems came from the tomb raiding, but their punishment came from some of the booby traps that were laid inside of the pyramids or alternate passageways. Robberies and murders were usually treated with the "eye for an eye" code (IE: Code of Hammurabi).
It depends upon whether or not you can learn from what you did to receive the punishments or not and if you had received rewards for having learned from past punishments, if that is the case, then it would be better to be receiving rewards presently, if not, hopefully, because you would be receiving punishments you will learn from it and then it would be better to be receiving punishments, as long as they're for good reasons.
There were many rules and punishments due to the many rulers with different personalities
Curious Punishments of Bygone Days was created in 1896.
There are a couple of reasons as to why punishments are imposed. one may include deterrence.