They felt that the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) would lead to "a parade of horrible s
, " such as the drafting of women, the end of laws protecting homemakers, the end of husband's responsibility to provide for his family, and same-sex
marriages
.
< It was "Phyllis Schlafly">
yes, they oppose all forms if government.
I'm puzzled by the question. German women did not 'oppose World War 1'.
because they can
nothing
No.
Phyllis Schlafly was one of the most vocal opponents of the Equal Rights Amendment. She worked hard and long to convince people to vote against it. As such, she is an important part of the struggle to get the amendment passed, even though she was strongly opposed to it.
No. I would not oppose an amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteeing Americans the right to marry someone of their own sex. I would, however, oppose an amendment that would ban same-sex marriage.
I would oppose such an amendment as a violation of states' rights as well as the civil rights of Americans.
I doubt it. The ninth amendment states the government cannot claim the only rights we have are listed in the Bill of Rights.
He believed it was unconstitutional and violated the tenth amendment
The second amendment was passed to ensure that the citizenry would always have the ability to oppose a tyrannical government.
order of importance novanet
order of importance novanet
The only states that opposed or at least didn't ratify Amendment 26 was Florida, Mississippi, Nevada, Kentucky, North Dakota, Utah, and New Mexico. The Amendment passed on July 1, 1971.
Northern democrats opposed the thirteenth amendment for a variety of reasons. But mainly because of their different interpretation of the constitution. Many of them did not believe that " All man were created equal" should be taken literally.
well maybe so theU.S constitution will make a law so women can vote
It would be a fairer proposition if the amendment also required extracts from the Koran, as well as the seven paths of Buddhism to be posted in schools. Arguably, anything less would be unethical in a multicultural society.