0
What sort of damage could result from a van backing up hill into a stopped vehicle?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Impossible to answer - nowhere near enough information is disclosed.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How much E85 gas can your car burn without damage?
If it is a flex fuel vehicle you can burn all you want. If not a flex fuel vehicle immediate damage can result. The Ethanol will damage the seals in the fuel system.
Do car accidents need a police report in AZ?
All crashes that result in vehicle damage must be reported to the police.
What is the technical definition of a road traffic accident?
The technical definition of a road traffic accident is a collision of one motor vehicle with another, a pedestrian, animal, or a stationary obstruction. Traffic collisions result in injury, death, vehicle damage and property damage.
Can you flat tow a Lexus gx470?
As stated in the owners manual. This vehicle is not designed to be towed with all 4 wheels on the ground. Doing so may result in serious damage to the vehicle.
What are lug nuts and what are they used for?
Lug nuts are rounded pieces used to attach a vehicle's wheel to its axle. This ensures that the vehicle's wheel is secure. Failure to use correct lug nuts for your vehicle can result in wheel damage.
What if fuel filter stopped uped?
Then the flow of fuel is impeded to the engine, and you'll notice the result... depending on the severity, your vehicle could be running lean, or not at all.
If I hit an animal control vehicle but caused no damage do I have a point on my California driver's license?
Points on a license will only be incurred from a citation. If you were not cited then it shouldn't result as a point.
Does 10000mg of tylonal always result in liver damage?
does 10000Mg of tylonal allways result in liver damage
What would result from damage to the superior colliculi?
Vision damage
Will a claim you retract before you make repairs still be shown as an accident or affect your premium?
If the only damage is to your car and the accident did not result in any property damage to anyone else then you can refuse payment and close the claim without settlement and should be able to avoid any negative impact on your rates. If on the other hand there is damage to another vehicle or property that will be paid by your insurance company then you might as well take what you can from your insurance company for your vehicle.
If an uninsured driver in Massachusetts hits a car in front of him and that car hits other cars in front of him is the uninsured driver responsible for the damage of all the cars in the accident?
An exact answer for this question is not possible without a lot more information, but I will try to give a partial answer in order to get this answer started. The actual and final answer will depend on Massachusetts LAW, AND investigative revelation of the true circumstances of the incident. Many years ago I was an auto insurance adjuster in Washington state, and have lived in Texas over 50 years. Based on my experiences, and related knowledge, the answer depends on who hit who when, and in what order. I will present some different situations which would result in different drivers being libel for damages to others. 1.)IF vehicle "A," which was "rear-ended" by the uninsured vehicle ["B"], was "knocked into" the vehicle ["C"] in front of "A," THEN vehicle "A" SHOULD NOT be libel for damage to vehicle "C." The driver of vehicle "B" SHOULD be found at fault for damage to both vehicles "A" and "C". 2.) However, IF vehicle "A" rear-ended vehicle "C," before being rear-ended by vehicle "B," THEN vehicle "A's" driver is responsible for damage to vehicle "C." 3.)However, assigning responsibility for damage really gets tough IF the investigation reveals that AFTER vehicle "A" rear-ended vehicle "C," vehicle "B" then rear-ended the vehicle "A"/vehicle "B" "stack." Theoretically, vehicle "A's" driver is only responsible to vehicle "C" for damage which vehicle "A" caused. And the driver of vehicle "B" SHOULD BE responsible for the damage caused to vehicle "A," and THE PORTION of additional damage to vehicle "C" which was actually caused by vehicle "B" "piling into" vehicles "B" AND "C." Whew!!!!! If this confuses you, don't feel like you are alone. That's why we have armies of investigators, insurance companies, attorneys, juries, and judges. Although I couldn't give you a more definitive answer, I hope this provides some understanding of the scale of the problem, and it's resolution.
Why government listen to the public opinion?
so the government can have public backing, which would ultimately result in re-election
