0
What sources of historical evidence would most help the historian form a historical argument to answer this question?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Primary sources such as written records, letters, official documents, and artifacts from the time period in question would be crucial for a historian to form a strong historical argument. Additionally, archaeological remains, oral histories, and other contemporary accounts would provide valuable evidence to support the argument. Comparing and analyzing different types of evidence can help to create a well-rounded and robust historical interpretation.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What makes a good historical question?
A good historical question is open-ended, specific, and focused. It should prompt investigation, analysis, and exploration of the past. It also encourages critical thinking and can lead to a deeper understanding of historical events, individuals, or societies.
Which is the most effective starting point for the process of historical inquiry?
The most effective starting point for historical inquiry is defining your research question or topic of interest. This helps provide focus and direction for your research, guiding you in identifying relevant sources and forming a coherent narrative.
How many people died in the lost city of atlantis?
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of the lost city of Atlantis, so it is impossible to determine how many people may have died there. The story of Atlantis comes from ancient Greek philosophy and mythology, and its fate is a subject of legend and speculation rather than historical fact.
What evidence shows that the Sumerians lived after the stone age?
Evidence such as the invention of writing, complex city structures, and specialized labor divisions indicate that the Sumerians lived after the Stone Age. The development of these sophisticated societal structures suggests a more advanced stage of human civilization beyond the simple tool-making societies of the Stone Age.
Should reparation be paid for ancestors?
The question of reparations for ancestors is complex and varies depending on the context. Some argue that reparations are necessary to address historical injustices and systemic inequalities that continue to impact descendants, while others may believe that accountability and reconciliation can be addressed through alternative means such as education, commemoration, and social programs. Ultimately, the decision on reparations for ancestors is influenced by historical context, legal considerations, and societal values.
What does a historian typically do immediately after forming a historical question?
Begin developing a historical argument to answer the historical question
What Problem Might A Historian Have When Trying To Use This Book As A Source For A Historical Argument?
Which book are you asking about? As it stands, this is an unanswerable question. I suspect the question is quoted from a homework assignment associated with some book.
Which of The following best describes a historical argument?
A explanation for why a past event happened apex
What is conflicting evidence?
It is evidence that can tend to support both sides of a question, argument, or case.
A historian makes an interpretation when he or she?
Answer this question… analyzes evidence to develop a better understanding of the past.
How many wars did ancient Greece have?
According to Historian Pulanco, Melchor of the Philippine Historical Astronomical Institute est in 1400bc. There is no answer to this question yet.
Why would a historian use primary source when studying about a historical event?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
Why would a historian use a primary source when studying about historical event?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
What is the name of the person that collects the evidence from the bones?
If this question refers to evidence from an historical point of view, such as studying dinosaur bones, the answer is palaeontologist.If the question refers to the collection of evidence from a scientific/medical or even criminal point of view, the answer is forensic anthropologist.
Which term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
The most important question in evaluating an argument is whether or not author used an appropriate tone?
The most important question in evaluating an argument is whether the author provided sufficient evidence to support their claims, followed by assessing the logic and reasoning used. Tone can influence how the argument is perceived but is not the most crucial factor in determining its validity or strength.
Why is it important for historians to corroborate the information found in pieces of historical evidence?
Answer this question… Different pieces of evidence may contradict the original information.
