There are many statements about the treatment of slaves that are not correct. For instance it would not be true to say that slaves got preferential treatment from their masters.
slaves were used because indian populations was destroyed
If the statement in the document was given under oath, it would be a sworn statement. But simply signing a document does not meet that criteria.
Teenagers should have a curfew at 1o:oopm
You can contact CPS and "correct" any statements you may have made to them. However be aware that if they have already taken action based on those statements you could be in for trouble. While CPS is not considered a law enforcement agency there are penalties for hindering an investigation conducted by them.
Kush was conquered by Askum.
It is true that Kush was invaded by Rome,
Kush was conquered by Askum.
The statement is false . Part of Kush was located in what is currently known as southern Egypt. It was also located in what is now Sudan.
No, the correct statement is: That is mine.
I am sorry but we can't answer because we don't have the statements you were given.
The Correct Answer To This Quistion Would Scientificly Speaking Be: Barney
Because other trade routes went around Kush entirely.
To take back (or retract) a statement means to say that the statement was not correct, or is no longer correct.
The Correct Answer To This Quistion Would Scientificly Speaking Be: Barney
Yes, that is a grammatical statement.
That is the correct spelling for statement (account, report).