Want this question answered?
they use the evidence from the past that will tell them what exactly happened, or they ask people who were at that certain place and time.
the historians use graphs to something that happened over . unicorns are fluffy.
Much of these charts were written in the Dresden Codex, a document smuggled out of Central America at a time when the Spanish were destroying Mayan documents, regarding them as pagan.
Motivational techniques only works if you use correct grammar.
Which types of techniques did WHICH Vietnam use? There were two Vietnams: North Vietnam and South Vietnam.
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Historians use corroboration, which involves cross-referencing multiple sources to confirm the accuracy of information, and contextualization, which involves placing evidence within its historical context to better understand its meaning and significance.
Historians use evidence from various sources, such as primary documents, artifacts, and secondary sources, to analyze and interpret events. They critically evaluate the credibility and bias of each source before synthesizing the information to form a conclusion. The process involves identifying patterns, making connections, and considering different perspectives to arrive at a well-supported interpretation.
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
Historians use a variety of clues to piece together the past, including written records, artifacts, architecture, artwork, and oral history. They also utilize scientific methods such as carbon dating and archaeological techniques to uncover and analyze evidence. By combining these different sources of information, historians can construct a more accurate understanding of historical events and societies.
they use the evidence from the past that will tell them what exactly happened, or they ask people who were at that certain place and time.
Historians use primary sources, which are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time period being studied, and secondary sources, which are interpretations or analyses of primary sources by other historians. Both types of evidence are important in constructing an accurate and comprehensive understanding of historical events.
ÙˆTechnology and electronics
To find answers to questions about the past using evidence
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Corroborating it with other pieces of evidence