Get around it. By being immediately defensive and backing up your own side of it, whether right or wrong, they will get defensive and do the same thing back, providing themselves with further "logic" to support their own views. You cannot win. If you lose you lose outright, if you give an undeniable logical opinion that cannot be argued against, they will despise you for injuring their pride and will not change their opinion anyway seeing as they are acting by emotion at this point of personal attack rather than logic. Control your temper, listen to everything they have to say, and hear them out without interruption. After this, look for areas of agreement and focus on these first. Anywhere where you can admit error, be honest and say so. By apologising for your own mistakes you disarm your opponent and make them drop the defensiveness. Now promise to think the rest over and give your conclusions at a later time after looking at facts. This will save you from rushing into a situation where you make a mistake with your final decision, leaving you open to them saying "I told you so.", which will not do much for your standing as an authoritive opinion holder. When you have come to a decision, tell it to them in such a way as to let them know how they benefit from it, giving a win-win.
Stay calm and try to listen actively to the other person's perspective. Avoid using accusatory language and focus on expressing your feelings and thoughts clearly. Seek common ground and work towards finding a resolution that satisfies both parties.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
The correct spelling of the word is argument.Some example sentences with this word are:There is an argument next door.The political argument wore on for hours.His argument brought up some valid points.
Probably not, but it helps after an argument is settled.
An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.
If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
argument
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.
The claim is the argument you plan to prove.
To have an argument called Debate
A central argument is a dominant and controlling argument.
The correct spelling of the word is argument.Some example sentences with this word are:There is an argument next door.The political argument wore on for hours.His argument brought up some valid points.