0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was NAACP v Alabama an important case?
NAACP v Alabama was important because it would have prohibited the NAACP from operating in the state of Alabama. The NAACP won the case and it was a big victory for civil rights.
How did NAACP fight segregration?
by bringing laws suits
How did he NAACP fight segregation?
by bringing laws suits
What was the most immediate goal of the NAACP during the 1920s?
lobbied for anti-lynching laws
Which of the group rose up to fight against policies such as Jim Crow laws?
NAACP
What was the one reason the founding of the NAACP?
Some of the reasons for the founding of the NAACP were:The desire to oppose racismAfrican Americans' desire for more opportunitiesJim Crow lawsSegregation laws
What was one reason for the founding of the NAACP A. Segregation laws B. The film The Birth of a Nation C. Red Scare D. Great Migration?
Segregation laws
What was one reason for the founding the NAACP?
Some of the reasons for the founding of the NAACP were:The desire to oppose racismAfrican Americans' desire for more opportunitiesJim Crow lawsSegregation laws
What did NAACP successfully challenge in 1920 and 1930?
The Jim Crow laws and publicized lynchings by white supremacist in the south.
How are laws derived from case law?
"Laws" are not derived from "case law" - DECISIONS are derived from case law.
Who fought in court to overturn the Georgia laws about the Indians?
The Cherokee?
What organization brought the case of Brown v. Board of Education to the courts?
The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) and the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, which was a subgroup of the organization. The NAACP was instrumental in advancing the civil rights of African-Americans by locating suitable plaintiffs and providing legal support for challenging discriminatory laws across the United States.Late Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall won 29 of 32 cases he argued before the US Supreme Court as lead counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950s and early 1960s. Marshall argued Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) before the Court twice - in 1952 and 1953 - because Chief Justice Earl Warren wanted the attorneys on the case to submit briefs arguing whether the 14th Amendment was intended to allow segregation.Case Citation:Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)
