Slaves may have refrained from killing their masters due to fear of severe punishment or retaliation by other white people in the community. Additionally, some slaves may have retained a sense of moral or religious obligation that prevented them from resorting to such extreme actions.
In many historical contexts, masters who killed slaves were not typically charged with murder due to the dehumanization and lack of legal protections for slaves. However, in some cases where the killing was particularly egregious or received public outcry, masters may have faced legal consequences.
When slaves obeyed their masters, they often faced harsh conditions and were subject to physical punishment if they did not comply. Obedience to their masters did not always guarantee leniency or protection, as masters had the authority to mistreat and exploit their slaves as they saw fit.
They became free.
According to James Henley Thornwell, a 19th-century theologian and preacher, slaves who obeyed their masters were fulfilling their duty as stated in the Bible. Thornwell believed that slavery was a fundamental social institution ordained by God, and obedience to masters was a way for slaves to demonstrate their piety and submission to divine authority.
Generally speaking, when slaves obey their masters it is to avoid being beaten or killed. Disobedient slaves are severely punished.
For the same reasons modern civilizations had slaves. To do work and serve the masters
In many historical contexts, masters who killed slaves were not typically charged with murder due to the dehumanization and lack of legal protections for slaves. However, in some cases where the killing was particularly egregious or received public outcry, masters may have faced legal consequences.
no they arent kind to slaves
Because, they were property to their slave masters, and the slave masters could do anything that they wanted to the slaves in order for the slaves to keep their lives.
slaves have to remain loyal to their masters or else they get beaten and whipped. most masters whip their slaves if they don't do what they are asked to. slaves have to be careful and do as they are asked.
When slaves obeyed their masters, they often faced harsh conditions and were subject to physical punishment if they did not comply. Obedience to their masters did not always guarantee leniency or protection, as masters had the authority to mistreat and exploit their slaves as they saw fit.
James Henley Thornwell believed that when slaves obeyed their masters, it would enhance their spiritual well-being and help maintain social order. He argued that obedience to authority, even in the context of slavery, was a means for slaves to cultivate virtues such as patience, humility, and faith.
slave masters wanted to erase the slaves' cultural identity.
Cannibals All! or, Slaves Without Masters was written by George Fitzhugh in 1857
Masters were not kind to their slaves due to a belief in the superiority of their own race, a desire to maintain control and power over others, and economic interests that benefited from the labor of enslaved individuals. This unjust and oppressive system allowed masters to exploit and mistreat their slaves without consequence.
John Browns intent was to start a revolt by slaves, with the slaves killing their masters. This outraged many Southerners, and widened the division between North and South.
All slaves served their masters for their masters' or their life. Different cultural angles such as America ,gave the owner freedom to release slaves whenever wanted.