A constitutional monarchy, such as Great Britain. In law, Queen Elizabeth II is very restricted in her powers as monarch. In practice, there are probably enough Members of Parliament who would call for a vote of no confidence and trigger new elections for Parliament if the Prime Minister tried to pass a law that she really didn't like.
the form of government England established during the glorious revolution was a constitutional monarchy. which means the powers of the ruler are restricted by the constitution and the laws of the country.
the form of government England established during the glorious revolution was a constitutional monarchy. which means the powers of the ruler are restricted by the constitution and the laws of the country.
the form of government England established during the glorious revolution was a constitutional monarchy. which means the powers of the ruler are restricted by the constitution and the laws of the country.
Dictatorship Its a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a constitution, laws or opposition etc.). He dominantes his subjects through threat of punishment and violence.
its a dicator, or a king.dictatorship: a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a constitution or laws or opposition etc.)absolutism: dominance through threat of punishment and violence wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwnA government in which a single ruler is vested with absolute power.
It depends on the type of government the country has.
Washington led the country fairly and with an even hand. He also restricted his presidency to two terms to keep from becoming a lifetime ruler like a monarch.
Washington led the country fairly and with an even hand. He also restricted his presidency to two terms to keep from becoming a lifetime ruler like a monarch.
You may mean 'constitutional monarchy' - A monarchy in which the powers of the ruler are restricted to those granted under the constitution and laws of the nation.
Dictatorship
Using the words 'immunity' assumes the dictators rule was unpleasant and harmful to the country and its population. Any ruler that is not effectively restricted by a constitution, laws and recognised opposition should be called to account for actions taken, and dealt with accordingly
I have no idea what so ever. I believe that a multiparty democracy is a country with a democratic goverment. And a constitutional monarchy is a monarchy in which the powers of the ruler are restricted to those granted under the constitution and laws of the nation. Hope that helps.