The simple answer would be .com because it indicates a private business. However, there can be no general determination of reliability based on the URL domain suffix. Sites run by a government (.gov), organizations (.org), and educational institutions (.edu) may either have more credibility or less, based on user experience and the diligence of their website staffs.
The secondary suffix (geographical location) may also prompt a closer consideration of information from some sites, because some areas of the world have fewer laws governing the use of the internet.
Social networking is the least acceptable source of accurate and unbiased scientific information. When on social networking, opinions outweigh scientific fact.
internet sites that can be edited by any user are generally not acceptable as a source of accurate and unbiased scientific information. These sites tend to reflect the views of the writers, without any peer review or research.
Answer this question… Which of the following Internet sources is the least reliable for research?
Commercial businesses. Apex.
i think its .org
An internet site that is run by ignorant and deluded people would be the least acceptable source of accurate and unbiased scientific information; an example would be any site operated by the Church of Scientology.
The simple answer would be .com because it indicates a private business. However, there can be no general determination of reliability based on the URL domain suffix. Sites run by a government (.gov), organizations (.org), and educational institutions (.edu) may either have more credibility or less, based on user experience and the diligence of their website staffs.The secondary suffix (geographical location) may also prompt a closer consideration of information from some sites, because some areas of the world have fewer laws governing the use of the internet.Social networking is the least acceptable source of accurate and unbiased scientific information. When on social networking, opinions outweigh scientific fact.Internet sites that can be edited by any user are generally not acceptable as a source of accurate and unbiased scientific information. These sites tend to reflect the views of the writers, without any peer review or research.
Although there is plenty of accurate information available on the Internet, you need to be careful. There are plenty of websites that appear to be accurate, but are not. You should always research any information you find on the Internet to ensure its accuracy.
When obtaining information found on the internet, it is often an issue as to if the information is accurate. It can also be a concern as to if the author or writer has an ulterior motive.
Scientific information is when you get asked or told to find information on a topic say heat for example you will search the Internet on heat then copy and paste in onto a Microsoft word and there you go you have some scientific information. :)
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a reliable internet source that provides accurate information on the history of linguistics. Another reputable source is the Linguistic Society of America website, which offers information on the field of linguistics and its history.
When obtaining information found on the Internet, it is often an issue as to if the information is accurate. It can also be a concern as to if the author or writer has an ulterior motive.
Internet enables you to find information fast that's a good thingthe bad thing is that not all information found on the internet is accurate.
Yes the answer is true
Just remember that anyone can write anything on the internet. You should consult a professional for accurate information. However, a pro is that it might give you some basic and interesting information.
A book is usually more reliably accurate, but the information provided is limited by the scope of the book. A book of diseases would provide a more brief overview of cancer and it's causes. The internet will have the latest and best information, but also some less than accurate information as well. You will need to consider the source, reputable cancer organizations will have accurate information and will be able to get much more in depth in the descriptions and causes that a book could, plus websites are constantly being updated with new information so they would be the most informative.