An internet site that is run by ignorant and deluded people would be the least acceptable source of accurate and unbiased scientific information; an example would be any site operated by the Church of Scientology.
i think its .org
.com
A fair test is important so you can get accurate and unbiased results.
It would make more sense if you asked, "How does scientific method help...?" Solving a scientific problem requires a rational, unbiased analysis of observations, experimental results, other's work in the field, etc. As well as required background knowledge! The key to it all really is logical, clear thinking and examination.
unbiased
Answer: D - none of the aboveExplanation: apex
People who perform experiments take some care to avoid introducing their personal bias into the results. But even if there is a bias, the same experiment may be done by other people who have other biases or who are more successful in working in an unbiased manner. Eventually, truth will emerge.
The simple answer would be .com because it indicates a private business. However, there can be no general determination of reliability based on the URL domain suffix. Sites run by a government (.gov), organizations (.org), and educational institutions (.edu) may either have more credibility or less, based on user experience and the diligence of their website staffs.The secondary suffix (geographical location) may also prompt a closer consideration of information from some sites, because some areas of the world have fewer laws governing the use of the internet.Social networking is the least acceptable source of accurate and unbiased scientific information. When on social networking, opinions outweigh scientific fact.Internet sites that can be edited by any user are generally not acceptable as a source of accurate and unbiased scientific information. These sites tend to reflect the views of the writers, without any peer review or research.
The simple answer would be .com because it indicates a private business. However, there can be no general determination of reliability based on the URL domain suffix. Sites run by a government (.gov), organizations (.org), and educational institutions (.edu) may either have more credibility or less, based on user experience and the diligence of their website staffs.The secondary suffix (geographical location) may also prompt a closer consideration of information from some sites, because some areas of the world have fewer laws governing the use of the internet.Social networking is the least acceptable source of accurate and unbiased scientific information. When on social networking, opinions outweigh scientific fact.Internet sites that can be edited by any user are generally not acceptable as a source of accurate and unbiased scientific information. These sites tend to reflect the views of the writers, without any peer review or research.
In order to obtain accurate performance information, raters must provide objective and unbiased ratings of employees
A fair test is important so you can get accurate and unbiased results.
None of them is "more accurate". They are answers to two different questions.
To make sure the reviewers have a unbiased atittude towards what is reviewed
Elliptical Trainer reviews can be found on several sites on the internet. Cnet reviews offer unbiased, actual user reviews. Also unbiased reviews can be obtained from Best Buy.
It is always difficult to find a completely unbiased report on a genocide due to the emotiveness of the subject. However, some good places to try are the Washington Post and New York Times websites.
What is media conscience and accountability?
The best place to find an unbiased opinion on the best dog foods would be a veterinarian. They have a solid scientific knowledge of what dogs need and would not be trying to tell any specific products to you.
it mean you should be unbiased with the data and do not let your emotion try to color the facts
Only if you make it unbiased. Samples can be weird. If you make it unbiased, then yes.