For the basics, if you are expecting to expand and gain more employees you would want to use a client server. Otherwise, using a peer to peer is easier to set up.
Pretty much a client server network is known as a client server network.
I don't believe that is a true statement. Client server networks provide a function of security and data resource sharing. An intranet is just a private, internal network primarily used by employees of a company, or a network that keeps its information internally. Even in an intranet you still have a client server relationship within the network.
VPN client stands for Virtual Private Network. It is a way for a company to allow employees to have remote access to their server's at it's central location when working from other sites.
Simple: in order to have a client-server architecture you need a network. The role of the network is to move data packets between the client and the server. In a client-server architecture the server usually has to manage the network (for example, a domain controller in a Windows environment).
Client-server technology is not industry specific; any company that would benefit from a client-server network would use it. Further to the point, any company that uses email uses a client-server technology. We can therefore say that client server technology has become ubiquitous, and can not be attributed to any particular industry or segment.
For the internet; your web browser is the client and the web server is the server.
The computer on a network that requests resources from the server is called the client. The server may also be used to implement administrative security for the client computers.
Media is always required to connect one device to another on a network. It doesn't matter if it is a client server network or a peer to peer network.
False - a peer-to-peer network is simpler.
a client/server network
a client/server network.
yup .. you can