0
What type of reasoning draws conclusions based on your beliefs rather than facts?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
All reasoning depends at least in part on beliefs. What we accept as a "fact" is a matter of belief. Most people accept things as facts because the people around them believe the same things. Many of these "facts" can be readily disproved scientifically, but are still accepted as fact because there is a social, political or economic pressure to do so.The science of logic accepts this and thus examines not the factual nature of the basis of the reasoning but the coherence of the thought process which leads from the alleged facts to the conclusion.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
The type of reasoning that draws conclusions based on beliefs rather than facts is called confirmation bias. This occurs when we selectively seek out information that supports our existing beliefs and ignore evidence that contradicts them. It can hinder rational thinking and decision-making.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When you form general ideas and rules based on your experience and oberservations you call that form of reasoning?
Forming conclusions based on experience and observations is called inductive reasoning
How deductive and inductive reasoning are the same?
Deductive and inductive reasoning are both methods of logical thinking used to draw conclusions. They both involve making observations, forming hypotheses, and reaching conclusions based on evidence. However, deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions.
Inductive reasoning is an process which means it is based on experiences and observations made in the real world?
Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific instances or observations. It is a bottom-up approach that uses specific examples to draw likely conclusions. This method is often used in scientific research and can lead to probable rather than absolute conclusions.
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
If you conduct an experiment and draw conclusions that are based on your beliefs rather than facts you are using?
Objective reasoning
Reasoning that makes conclusions based on patterns?
Inductive reasoning dude...
What is type of reasoning where conclusions are based on patterns you observe called?
inductive reasoning
Type of reasoning where conclusions are based on given facts?
Deductive
What is a type of reasoning where conclusions are based on given facts?
additive property
Deductive reasoning is stronger than inductive reasoning because it?
draws conclusions based on premises everyone can agree on
Which of this best describes inductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is a type of reasoning where conclusions are made based on patterns and observations. It involves moving from specific observations to broader generalizations. It is probabilistic and does not guarantee certainty in the conclusions drawn.
When you form general ideas and rules based on your experience and oberservations you call that form of reasoning?
Forming conclusions based on experience and observations is called inductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or examples, while deductive reasoning involves starting with general premises and using them to reach specific conclusions. Inductive reasoning is more probabilistic and involves making educated guesses, while deductive reasoning is more logical and deterministic. Both types of reasoning are used to draw conclusions and make decisions in various fields such as science, mathematics, and philosophy.
What type of scientific reasoning relies on gathering and evaluating evidence?
objective means that you make decisions and draw conclusions based on evidence, subjective means that personal feelings have entered into a decison or conclusion.
Reasoning based on what you know about a sample which you use to draw conclusions about the larger target population?
none of the above
What is a antonym for the word inference?
An inference is a conclusion based on logical reasoning from other facts rather than something that is known as a fact. It does not really have an exact antonym. I suppose there are two classes on "non-inferences" - conclusions based on direct actual observation and in contrast, conclusions based on random guesswork or emotion or intuition without any logical basis.
