Want this question answered?
Absolutely not.It can't.most plants roots are underground. the amount of air in the soil is very minimal,and it is used up by creatures in the ground.So there would not be any air for the root to absorb.Hope this is usefull! :)
by the water coming then the soil would become fertile soil so then plants can grow faster in the fertile soil. thank you for your question by permeability
clay soil
The methoxide ion would steal a hydrogen ion from water, forming sodium hydroxide and methanol. CH3ONa + H2O --> CH3OH + NaOH
The iron would not rust, because calcium chloride is a desiccant. For rusting to occur there are two vital components: water and oxygen. Since calcium chloride is a desiccant, it would absorb the water, so rusting would not occur.
No the water would drain around the chips. They would not absorb water.
no it would not absorb the most.
A parking lot, generally made of blacktop or concrete, would have more runoff. Grass, with earth below it, would absorb more water. Blacktop cannot be penetrated by water. Concrete can absorb water, but only a very little, especially as compared to a grassy field.
the formation of a mountain range
A longer hair root would absorb more water. This is because it has more surface to collect the water.
Root hairs help the root absorb more water and nutrients from the soil. The absence of root hairs would reduce the plant's ability to absorb water and nutrients.
They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.They brought water to their cities by the use of their famous aqueducts. If the terrain were uneven, arches were used to support the piping. However, most Roman aqueducts were underground, so uneven terrain would not be a problem.
it would absorb the water into the raisins to equal out the concentration within the water and the raisins.
The number one answer would be salt.
Porous rocks absorb water. Anything that can absorb water would not be good at containing it.
Water
Neither. It doesn't absorb water.