There are some good books on the subject from the US and UK perspective.
There were some acts of military genius - the landing at Incheon.
There was fighting against vastly superior numbers.
There were the first combat use of Jet fighters.
There were massive set-backs and enormous victories.
And after all the deaths and suffering - there was everyone back where they started.
In short, it was the same as any other war or conflict, bloody, brutal and costly.......
It was a seasonal conflict, sweat in the summer and freeze in the winter. To advance meant climbing hills and mountains because that was where the Chinese and North Koreans fought from........In my opinion, one of a kind conflict...............
I disagree: You are only illuminating one aspect of the conflict. Yes there was considerable hill to hill defence - but much of the pacific campaign of WWII was similar in parts.
The only recourse is to read a book on the whole conflict to get a feel for the different phases and aspects of the conflict.
There was fighting. Unlike the cold war.
North Korean invading forces
No, there was no winner at the end of the Korean War. It ended with a cease-fire. That is, the sides agreed to stop fighting.
North Korea, China and a few Russians.
None, most of the fighting in the Korean War was on land or in the air.
There was fighting. Unlike the cold war.
it was probably koreans!
Fighting Communist aggression.
An end to the fighting.
Communist aggression.
North Korean invading forces
To stop communist aggression.
The US was fighting in the Korean war
No, there was no winner at the end of the Korean War. It ended with a cease-fire. That is, the sides agreed to stop fighting.
No nuclear weapons were used in the korean war
It was a tie. They all stopped fighting.
North Korea, China and a few Russians.