Obama
Well that all depends on what you mean...in Texas government the Texas governor is going to have more veto power due to the fact that the United States President does not control state legislation. In the US legislation the US President is going to have the most veto power because the Texas governor has no control over Federal legislation.
Andrew Johnson is the US president that vetoed a bill just to have it overturned by congress in less than 24 hours.
In the US, that would be the president.
Lincoln
The President of the US may request legislation. If they wish, Congress writes the legislation, discusses the proposed legislation and finally votes for, or against, the legislation. If the Congress disagrees with the President's request they don't do anything, end of subject. That is a check. If they write it, discuss it and approve it, then it is sent to the President for his approval. He can approve the legislation (balance) or veto the legislation (check). Congress can initiate legislation without the request of the President. If after congress passes the legislation the President approves the legislation that's a balance (both Congress and the President agree). However, if the President vetoes the legislation it is returned to the Congress. If 2/3 of the Senators in the Senate vote affirmative on the legislation they can over ride the Presidential veto (check). Now suppose legislation is passed by Congress and signed into law by the President AND SOMEBODY DISAGREES WITH THE NEW LAW. Then that person/group can challenge that law on a constitutional basis in Federal Court. At any point in the legal challenge a Federal Court may over turn the law. There are three different types of Federal Courts. Ranked by authority, from low to high, they are District Courts, Courts of Appeal, and finally the Supreme Court of the US. Each step up the ladder of courts is another check on the court below. The review of the legislation can stop at any point that the challenger decides to quit and that ends the review. If the legislation is overturned by the Federal Court system then the legislative branch has three choices: they can do nothing and the issue dies; they can attempt to rewrite the legislation in a manner that avoids the conflict with the Constitution; ultimately, they can attempt to amend the Constitution so that the Courts can have no objection. In the case of any action taken by one of the branches of government there is a way to stop, or review, the action by another branch of government. I'm sure I've missed some possibilities, but that should give you and idea of how checks and balances work in the US government.
Not under current legislation. Currently you have to be born in the USA, to become president.
The Supreme Court is the head of the judicial branch of the government and has the responsibility to enforce the Constitution. If legislation is found to be unconstitutional then it is overturned.
Colorado sought Statehood once and the Legislation passed the US Congress only to be vetoed by the President. They had to wait until 1876 for the enabling legislation was approved and signed by President Grant.
By making a rule or letter to the president saying i want some power because the president doesn't really do anything they just states the laws i am a person from the supreme court and how the president treats us
The US Vice President is the second highest official of the Executive Branch, and is also President of the Senate, although he is less involved with the legislation there than are the actual US Senators.
No. The President is free to draft legislation and present to congress for consideration, but they are under no constitutional obligation to accept the recommendation. The President does have broad powers to issue Executive Orders.
By the 21st Amendment to the US Constitution.