Basically that species adapt to their environment by changing and developing gradually, thus becoming more successful and better suited to survive and multiply.
Species proliferate through variation (mutation) with common descent (inherited characteristics) and natural selection.
Darwin's theory proposes most of the species today arose through gradual changes in previously existing species. All mammals, for example, inherited traits from some common ancestor. Because whales are mammals, they would have evolved from some terrestrial mammal. All terrestrial vertebrates (mammals, birds and dinosaurs, reptiles, and amphibians) would share common ancestry with some amphibious ancestor that lived several hundred million years ago.
One bit of evidence in support of this theory is that all terrestrial vertebrates (including cetaceans) have inherited the same amphibious body plan for limbs, backbone, pelvis, and rib cage, similar to that of the sarcopterygian lungfish from which it appears they share common ancestry.
Reptiles, dinosaurs and birds are all diapsids. Mammals are synapsids. Turtles are anapsids. If evolution were wrong, there would be no reason for this to be the case.
Darwin's theory of evolution is often stated as: 'Survival of the Fittest" (though Darwin NEVER said this) or "Natural selection." More precisely, it amounts to the idea that when an organism differs from its family and neighbours in such a way that it can produce more young that in turn can successfully produce more young, its line will increase and eventually displace its less successfully reproducing rivals.That is what a revolutionary fitness amounts to. Note that not just any difference will do; the differences have to be heritable - they must pass on from parent to offspring, or they will have very little to do with evolution through natural selection.
Genetic mutations occur in every species. Sometimes these are beneficial. For example a calf born more muscular than the rest will be more likely to mate and consequently pass on his genes to his offspring.
There are hundreds of others, but the suggestion: 'Or Google "evolution Darwin" ' is strictly for people who already have a good basic understanding of the field. Although there is a lot of good stuff on Google, for every reliable article on evolution, you have to dig it out of a torrent of garbage. For some peculiar reason, Darwinism in one form or another has been selected as the arch enemy by every second dishonest evangelist (and there are thousands of them!) and a lot of evangelists that may be honest enough to preach, but not honest to get their facts on the subject straight. If they were to seriously study the subject, they could tell that it has practically nothing to do with scripturally based faith.
Remember a very important point if you begin to study evolution in Biology (or related concepts too, in fact): The principles are so simple that most people who first hear of them say something like: "Oh! How easy! I understand that; it is obvious!" The fact is that although the principles do seem easy, it does not follow that the whole subject is easy. It is a beautiful subject, but it requires serious work and careful thought to avoid making a fool of yourself, whether you are a genius or not. To imagine that because its principles are simple, a subject is simple, is an error. A brick may be easy to pick up, but it does not follow that a house made of bricks is easy to pick up. The basic principles of mathematics are simple too, but that does not mean that mathematics is a subject for the simple-minded. Much the same is true for evolution.
Don't let me put you off; it is a lovely, lovely subject, but it is not a subject that you can master by reading a book about it, not anyone's book.
Developments since Darwin The theory of (biological) evolution has advanced since Darwin's time. For example:
I agree with the "Developments" paragraphs, but would like to remark about the bit: "...scientists sometimes change their minds about...": John Maynard Keynes said:"When the facts change, I change my mind sir. What do you do?" Remember that when scientists worthy of the name change their minds, it is because the facts at their disposal have changed.
One of Charles Darwin's theory is named The Origin of Species which he discovered during the visit of an archipelago of volcanic islands, Charles discovers a massive amount of diverse species. From this, he deducts that animals with variations better suited to their environment would have a better chance of survival and ability to breed. They would then pass on the favorable characteristics to their offspring.
was darwinism an important aspect of what genre?
Satan is the modern-day champion of Darwinism.
it helps solve social, political, and ecumenical issues. :)
Darwinism is an explanatory model; manifest destiny is an ideology.
It refers to the belief in Evolution. See also:What do religious people answer to Darwinism?
Social Darwinism.
Neo-Darwinism is an elaboration on Darwinism, a synthesis between modern genetics and classical Darwinism. Punctuated equilibrium is a model of Darwinism in which the rate of divergence is highly variable, as opposed to a gradualistic model of Darwinism. Panspermia is a model for the origin of life, specifically how life could have originated off-planet and then transported here. Intelligent Design is a religious view. So really, you're listing three entirely different things here (Evolution, Origin-of-Life, Religion).
That is the correct spelling of the proper noun Darwinism. It refers to the theories of biologist Charles Darwin, specifically the survival of the fittest.
Social Darwinism emerged in the late 19th century, gaining popularity in the 1870s and 1880s. It was influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and was used to justify various social, political, and economic ideologies.
There is some debate about Rudyard Kipling's views on social Darwinism. Some argue that his works may have reflected elements of social Darwinism, while others suggest that he critiqued the idea through his portrayal of characters and societies in his stories. Ultimately, it is not definitive whether Kipling was explicitly against or in favor of social Darwinism.
Social Darwinism is the belief that certain social groups are more fit for survival and success due to natural selection principles. Some individuals argue that social Darwinism has been used to justify inequalities and discrimination in society.
YES