The Dred Scott case did not settle the slavery issue - it unsettled it.
The South interpreted it as a licence to travel in the North with their slaves, and possibly re-introduce slavery into free soil.
The North was thrown into confusion at the Supreme Court's suggestion that there was no such thing as free soil, because slavery was protected by the Constitution. It caused furious disputes, including the Lincoln-Douglas debates, which drew slavery to the attention of people not previously concerned with it.
boats annd hoes
Dred Scott rose the awareness of slavery.
...slavery was protected by the constitution on the grounds that a man's property was sacred and slaves were property.
His case.
Since he was a slave he was likely against slavery.
Dred Scott v. Sanford
boats annd hoes
Dred Scott rose the awareness of slavery.
Dred Scott was born into slavery in 1795.
...slavery was protected by the constitution on the grounds that a man's property was sacred and slaves were property.
"Bleeding Kansas"
Dred Scott's exact birthday is unknown. He was born into slavery in Virginia in 1799.
It allowed slavery and found Scott to be property.
His case.
Since he was a slave he was likely against slavery.
Dred Scott
dred scott decision