It depends, everyone has a different opinion about king tut some say people thought he was the best ruler some people said he should have not been a ruler at all.
It is unknown
King Tutankhamun died far to young to be a good ruler. He also was not in good health.
Tutankhaum was a good ruler because he reintroduced the Gods.
King Tut was the ruler of Egypt, so all the riches of that country were his. While he may not have been the richest of the Pharaohs, or the richest ruler in the world, he was far richer than any of the common people.
well king tut what a good and loyally king so he enforced a good and loyally government
a fat 1
It is unknown
King Tutankhamun died far to young to be a good ruler. He also was not in good health.
He wasn't a very strong ruler though he helped Egypt quite a lot.
Tutankhaum was a good ruler because he reintroduced the Gods.
King Tutankhamun was ruler of Ancient Egypt during the mid 1300's B.C.E.
No, he was th youngest at the age of 17-19.
good question!
The word "Malayalam" is a palindrome that means king or ruler in the Malayalam language, a language predominantly spoken in the Indian state of Kerala.
King Tut was the ruler of Egypt, so all the riches of that country were his. While he may not have been the richest of the Pharaohs, or the richest ruler in the world, he was far richer than any of the common people.
well king tut what a good and loyally king so he enforced a good and loyally government
i think he is a good king....because many articles said that he was disabled... i dont know....