They existed in roughly the same time period, they were at the top of a their respective social class, they were born into their rolls. On a simpler level; they both wore metal armor, were soldiers for their king/emperor and they murdered things with swords.
the differences are that samurai used different weaponry and Armour that were more light which helped them to move faster and made the attacks more efficiently while knights had a much more heavy Armour which limited their movement so they had to travel by horse and in the attack moment it was more slow
i think diffrent
how are you going
received salaries in payment for their service
Knights and Samurai
The difference between a shogun and a samurai is like the difference between a king and a knight.
samurai have an armor made out of bamboo, leather and some metal. but knights armor are made of steel or many chain mails joined together Samurai didnt have the chivalry that was requested from knights
received salaries in payment for their service
A ronin is a samurai. Samurai was a status in Japan. A ronin was simply someone of samurai status that had no clan affiliation.
The Samurai of the East have gone the way of the Knights of the West.
Three characteristics shared by knights and samurai were loyalty to their lords, adherence to a code of ethics (chivalry for knights, bushido for samurai), and the use of a variety of weapons and fighting techniques in battle.
Samurai
Samurai
Samurai, but actually knights were European Samurai.