Grant's overall strategy was to decimate Lee's army in Virginia while Sherman raided Georgia.
I don't know whether he used that actual term.
But when he became General-in-Chief in March 1864, he did call for harsh new measures, some of the unpopular, but which did eventually bring victory.
First, he ended prisoner-exchange. This would benefit him on balance, because the Confederates were running out of recruits. But it led to the appalling conditions of overcrowding at Andersonville prison-camp, where 45,000 Union troops were sent.
Then he settled on a war of attrition, knowing that Lee would not give up until his lines had been stretched too thin to hold. This caused massive Northern casualties, while according to map, Grant did not seem to be making much progress.
Meanwhile he sent Phil Sheridan to the Shenandoah Valley, telling him to destroy the farms so thoroughly that a crow flying over it would need to carry its own rations.
The idea of doing the same thing in Georgia was Sherman's, but Grant soon saw the sense in it, and told Sherman to "Make Georgia howl!"
By the time Sherman had finished with Georgia, and crossed the river into South Carolina in February 1865, the Confederates were so desperate that Lee was starting to do the unthinkable - planning to put slaves into uniform to defend the South.
The end could not be far.
He saw it as the only solution. Everything else had failed.
Grant was a good simplifier. He ended the system of prisoner-exchange for the simple reason that the Confederates were bound to run out of men first. Then he allowed Sherman to wreck the Georgia farms and railroads, simply because it would help to starve the Confederate armies in the field.
At a terrible cost in human suffering, these two strategies brought the war to a close.
General in Chief US Grant's strategy of total war was to destroy civilian sources of supply that could be used to help the Confederate war efforts. This strategy was needed as on a one to one basis, the Union armies could not defeat the Confederate armies on the battlefield. Also, only by siege, which was time consuming, could major cities such as Richmond be captured.
yhnbvbnbhivlbvlbvhigb jogcxfu7zewa5e64576r8t79870-987t67fyhgc.f;/'tvgfdixcfhgvcx call me at 478 774 4430 my real name is niyah
Robert E. Lee surrendered to him at Appomattox Court House, Virgina and the Union won the war. I think that answers the question.
Total War: Destroying everything in his path.
General Sherman.
containment strategy
Yalta
Total War
He planned a war of attrition-that is, to continue fighting until the south ran out of men supplies, and the will to fight
The Strategy used during both world wars is Total War
Total war was General Sherman's strategy. He was to use total war to destroy the resources of the south. I am also a civil war expert so you can trust my answer.
Empire Total War is an amazing game with good graphics, lots of strategy, and really good naval battles.
Robert E. Lee surrendered to him at Appomattox Court House, Virgina and the Union won the war. I think that answers the question.
Until the end of the war, tactics on both sides remained the same as in Napoleonic times. The union strategy was a blockade strategy at sea and on the rivers, coupled with a total war strategy to destroy the means of producing war supplies on land.
Total war is a war in which a belligerent engages in the complete every human resource, even that of non-combatants, as nevertheless part of the war effort.
Total War: Destroying everything in his path.
General Sherman.
The new strategy was based on total war on the Confederacy.
Sherman practiced a strategy called total war. They both surrounded their opponents.