If you mean an ingeniously-planned campaign that succeeded, try the Vicksburg campaign - either Grant's plan for crossing the Mississippi, or the cavalry raid across the state of Mississippi by Grierson, which greatly distracted and confused Grant's opponent.
If you mean a brilliant plan that could have been successful...
Try the Battle of the Crater, at the Siege of Petersburg in 1864. The Pennsylvania miners blew the Confederates off the ridge. But Grant (and/or Meade) aborted the mission, apparently because they were nervous about the black brigade who had been fully rehearsed for the attack, and ordered the luckless Burnside to send in a white brigade - unrehearsed - who were cut to bits.
The major and most important battle plan for the Union, was to defeat the Confederacy, and strive to rebuild the nation as one again.
He was the President during the civil war and kept the idea alive that the nation would come together. He commanded the Union troops, made a few mistakes, but in the long run got the right man to take control and that was Grant.He was the central figure of the civil war and the revolutionary war.
You should do your own schoolwork.
They had little in common, other than the desire to see the South back in the Union. Johnson was a slave-owning Democrat from a quasi-Southern state. Lincoln was a Midwestern Republican who fought a war to end slavery. The adoption of the "National Union" banner by the Republicans was successful in assuring Lincoln's re-election, but Lincoln's assassination meant a Democrat (Johnson) became President, assuring his failure to enact Lincoln's plans for Reconstruction.
The Union wanted to track down General Lee and force him to surrender.The Confederacy wanted to capture the Union Capitol of Washington D.C., capture President Lincoln, try him for war crimes, and re-confederate the states into a new union.
To take down the Union. They failed.
During the Civil War, the Union army focused on conquiring Southern land and freeing Confederate slaves.
The Union soldiers found Lee's battle plans at a Confederate camp and McClellan used the information to plan a successful counterattack. The loss at Antietam prevented Lee's advance forward to Washington D.C. It was the bloodiest single-day battle of the Civil War and of American history with Union casualties more than 12,000 and the Confederacy more than 13,000.
During the American Civil War, the Confederacy's initial military plan was a simple but enviable one: to defend its territory from Union incursions. Not needing to invade the Union in order to survive, the Confederacy only needed to parry any attacks that the Union might make against it.
The major and most important battle plan for the Union, was to defeat the Confederacy, and strive to rebuild the nation as one again.
There was a plan where they would blockade southern ports, and block their food and supply income
To provide information and action plans to help the African American community
No, there are no plans in America for a civil war, nor is there any need to have a civil war.
The plans of the Radical Republicans in Congress during the Civil War was to abolish slavery. They wanted to deal our harsh punishments to slave owners throughout the South for their part in slavery.
The so-called border states of Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware retained their slaves during the US Civil War and did not join the Confederacy. If they had, the chances for a successful war for secession by the South would have increased dramatically. During the US Civil War, President Lincoln attempted to present gradual plans to reduce then end slavery in the so-called border states.
It was clear from the beginning of the US Civil War, that the Union needed to use an offensive strategy to end the Southern rebellion. What came into doubt during the war was what type of offensive strategy would be the best approach. The Union had to adjust its war plans during the course of the rebellion due to Confederate actions and Northern politicians who tried to influence US President Lincoln on the best ways to conduct the war.
AnswerIn a lot of aspects yes, however there were a lot of things that didn't improve under the 5 year plans such as the living and working conditions of the peasants/workers.AnswerYou need to specify which five year plan - what country, what era, what government. Without more details you will never get a satisfactory answer. Some 5 year plans were successful, others were catastrophic failures. Five year plans are associated with China, the Soviet Union, and India.